Archive for Pam Livingston

What Can Failing Restaurants Tell Us about 1-to-1?

Success for restaurants are more complicated ...

Why would 1-to-1 be just about the device?

Recently I was read­ing some arti­cles on 1-to-1 pro­grams that didn’t live up to expec­ta­tions. This is not a new story, of course.

But there some­times is a ten­dency to believe that giv­ing a device to every stu­dent in a school or dis­trict or sub­set of this is mirac­u­lously going to solve all ills:

  • Test scores will rise!
  • Tech­nol­ogy skills will skyrocket!
  • Stu­dents will be engaged!
  • The com­mu­nity will sup­port us more fully!
  • Peo­ple will visit!
  • Every­one will love us!

It’s the same old story as when I first did the research for the first and then the sec­ond edi­tion of my book. There MUST be a mag­i­cal for­mula here, right? A ratio of 1-to-1 com­bined with every stu­dent and every teacher = huge nee­dle move in all the ail­ing and dif­fi­cult aspects of the school. Plus every­one will like it.

Sorry, there’s more work to it than that. Wish it were eas­ier but it’s not.

Here’s an inter­view with Celebrity Chef Robert Irvine writ­ten by Richard Feloni of Busi­ness Insider, list­ing the 5 things he sees as major rea­sons restau­rants fail. They are:

  • Inex­pe­ri­ence
  • Bad Peo­ple Management
  • Lack of Account­ing Skills
  • Spotty Cus­tomer Service
  • Sub-Par Food Qual­ity and Execution

There is no men­tion of stoves, refrig­er­a­tors, pots, pans, knives, utensils.

We need to look at edu­ca­tion holis­ti­cally and not about hard­ware or soft­ware. What is the expe­ri­ence in the class­room of the stu­dent, what are the fac­tors con­tribut­ing to that expe­ri­ence, what is the philo­soph­i­cal view­point of that school, what can we change, what can we improve, what do we have to work around, what is the lead­er­ship, what do teach­ers say, what do par­ents say, what do stu­dents say?

Tech­nol­ogy can’t solve every­thing, so let’s stop sim­pli­fy­ing this highly com­pli­cated endeavor. All those restau­rants which failed within 5 years had stoves, refrig­er­a­tors, elec­tric­ity, and gas. That’s not the rea­son they failed. Intro­duc­ing 1-to-1 with­out a seri­ous look at every­thing else can result in pock­ets of suc­cess but not trans­for­ma­tion. Take the time, energy and effort to go deeper.

- Pamela Livingston

 

 

Repost from Innovative Schools — Creating 1-to-1 Possibilities

This is a repost from Inno­vate My School orig­i­nally at http://bit.ly/1zNLxbf 

We’re in the twenty-fourth year of edu­ca­tors recog­nis­ing the ratio of 1:1 to mean one dig­i­tal device to one child, avail­able at school, at home and any­where. The very first exam­ple of 1:1 was at Ladies Methodist Col­lege in Mel­bourne, Aus­tralia when these vision­ary edu­ca­tors took the bold step of pro­vid­ing lap­tops to every 5–12 grade stu­dent. This is fully chron­i­cled in the book “Never Mind the Laptops”.

Since then, there have been suc­cesses and stum­bles, but one thing is cer­tain: the school, dis­trict or region con­sid­er­ing 1:1 needs to set the goals and direc­tion clearly and com­pletely to ensure mean­ing­ful edu­ca­tional use. To do this it is impor­tant to ask:

Once we have dig­i­tal devices that are avail­able through­out the school, what will we do with them?”

The answer to this ques­tion should be deter­mined after deep reflec­tive think­ing. Just as edu­ca­tors teach inquiry-based learn­ing so that the ques­tions from stu­dents are not sur­face but of depth and sub­stance, so should the edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tion embark on deep and mean­ing­ful dis­cus­sion to answer this ques­tion. Mis­sion and edu­ca­tional goals should drive the answer but so should the pos­si­bil­i­ties that might not have existed before. No school improve­ment pro­gramme has the depth and poten­tial for edu­ca­tion change than pro­vid­ing dig­i­tal devices to every stu­dent and teacher in a school.

Answers can come from thor­ough research on what works and what doesn’t, espe­cially from Project Red. We also have one of the pre­vi­ously largest pro­grammes, the State of Maine, with a long-range researched pro­gramme. Other answers can come from pock­ets of excel­lence such as the Urban School in San Fran­cisco which took the avail­abil­ity of lap­tops for stu­dents into new and amaz­ing heights when they began reach­ing out to their com­mu­nity and inter­view­ing Holo­caust sur­vivors. The Urban School is now get­ting stu­dents to inter­view adults to tell their sto­ries of the civil rights move­ment and his­toric moments. What an amaz­ing exam­ple of stu­dents mak­ing a dif­fer­ence in their local and national com­mu­nity, and attain­ing inter­na­tional renown. No one else has done what they have done. This pos­si­bil­ity only arose once stu­dents had dig­i­tal devices.

Another exem­plar is the Sci­ence Lead­er­ship Acad­emy in Philadel­phia. Project-based, inquiry-driven and student-centered, the dig­i­tally device-equipped stu­dents design and run projects, fully empow­ered by mobile dig­i­tal devices. They’ve received vis­its and inter­est from Barack Obama and many oth­ers, as the school achieves great suc­cess in an urban space with a mean­ing­ful and reflec­tive approach to learn­ing. Vis­it­ing a com­puter lab once a week could never offer this type of depth.

At my for­mer employer, The Peck School in Mor­ris­town, NJ lap­tops were orig­i­nally con­sid­ered as a home­work aide. Stu­dents with busy lives were hav­ing trou­ble com­plet­ing home­work, espe­cially with trav­el­ling require­ments from being part of sports teams and some­times liv­ing in more than one home because of divorce or sep­a­ra­tion. Lap­tops pro­vided the vehi­cle for tak­ing the work any­where, turn­ing in home­work elec­tron­i­cally, and keep­ing the arte­facts and resources of learn­ing in school with stu­dents at all times. But Peck did not stop there. Teach­ers worked hard to incor­po­rate these dig­i­tal devices into nearly all aspects of teach­ing and learn­ing. When I worked at Peck and peo­ple wished to visit to see lap­top use, I just had to be sure there weren’t tests hap­pen­ing in spe­cific class­rooms on the days of visit, as there would be lap­tops used otherwise.

Teach­ers often find dif­fer­en­ti­ated learn­ing to be accom­plished more fully using 1:1 because dif­fer­ent stu­dents can be assigned dif­fer­ent parts of a unit accord­ing to inter­est or level, and then work in that group on their own dig­i­tal devices using all the resources available.

St. Thomas Epis­co­pal Parish School in Coral Gables, Florida used lap­tops to fur­ther their stu­dent of life in Ancient Mesopotamia, a sig­na­ture yearly project. Stu­dents can learn dif­fer­ent aspects of this ancient civ­i­liza­tion and then come back together with their con­tri­bu­tions to the whole project. Every stu­dent is at a level play­ing field with devices and resources to empower their learning.

I vis­ited NSW Aus­tralia and saw some excel­lent uses of 1:1, includ­ing stu­dents emi­grat­ing to Aus­tralia and par­tic­i­pat­ing in a cul­ture and speech class. Their dig­i­tal devices allowed them to cre­ate per­sua­sive and infor­ma­tive speeches about their process of learn­ing the cul­ture and lan­guage of their new coun­try. Addi­tion­ally, cre­at­ing a record of their learn­ing in progress allowed them to return to each speech and under­stand their own growth and progress. Because tech­nol­ogy cre­ates this type of record, the arc of learn­ing can be under­stood and eval­u­ated not just by the teacher, but also by the learner. Hav­ing this per­sonal and mobile device meant learn­ing was pos­si­ble in mul­ti­ple ways and in mul­ti­ple spaces.

The pos­si­bil­i­ties are enor­mous once reflec­tive edu­ca­tors con­sider how the ratio of 1:1 can open up learn­ing in new ways. Don’t hold back, embrace 1:1 and see what can happen.

Always happy to speak about 1-to-1 –let me know your thoughts.

- Pamela

1-to-1: Starting Well

This was also posted on the Microsoft Partners-in-Learning Part­ners Hot Topic forum

I have vis­ited and con­sulted for schools in the U.S. and over­seas around 1-to-1 and also researched 1-to-1 for many years. These schools are in vary­ing stages of plan­ning, imple­men­ta­tion, roll­out, refresh and analy­sis. Most want advice on how their pro­grams are going in any of these stages. There is always the chance to return and cor­rect, but schools save them­selves the most time if they start well. Here are some point­ers for this:

  1. Involve all your stake­hold­ers in the vision­ing and plan­ning. While not every per­son can sit on your Vision­ing Com­mit­tee, rep­re­sen­ta­tives from your fac­ulty, admin­is­tra­tion, par­ents, and stu­dents will bring out ideas and per­spec­tives you need for suc­cess. And don’t for­get stu­dents – they are the sin­gle largest stake­holder in terms of num­bers and impact on their lives.
  2. Visit, attend con­fer­ences, research, ask many ques­tions. Schools embark­ing on 1-to-1 have the lux­ury that many oth­ers schools did this already. Assem­ble your ques­tions and a team and take road trips to other schools and to con­fer­ences. Be sure to ask the tough ques­tions such as:  What went wrong? What did you learn now in hindsight?
  3. Give teach­ers devices first – at least 6 months to 1 year before students.
  4. Invest in Pro­fes­sional Devel­op­ment but under­stand it should be var­ied and job-embedded. Make it rel­e­vant to each teacher in each class­room for each discipline.
  5. Include an online learn­ing com­mu­nity. With­out a uni­fy­ing sys­tem that every­one is part of (and not email) you risk class­rooms in silos that are not con­nected. Make 1-to-1 be about col­lab­o­ra­tion with a 1-stop shop­ping loca­tion every­one uses.
  6. Know that pilots don’t tell every­thing. Most schools pilot and expect the teach­ers pilot­ing to be the doc­u­menters of every­thing. How­ever, the pilot teach­ers are highly moti­vated and likely early adopters. Their workarounds and moti­va­tion might not scale to every teacher and every class­room. Expect the year after the pilot when more teach­ers come on board to be bumpy when issues are uncov­ered that didn’t come up dur­ing the pilot.
  7. Pay atten­tion to logis­tics. Spare devices, power cords, bat­ter­ies, charg­ing sta­tions, cases, insur­ance all mat­ter. Your vis­its and research will help with this.
  8. If you’re going BYOD, make sure you know what you’re get­ting into. Good news is that many schools are suc­cess­ful and you can pick their brains. A great place for BYO infor­ma­tion is Thurs­day nights 9 p.m. U.S. East­ern time to fol­low #byotchat on Twit­ter and to search their archives. The peo­ple con­tribut­ing have solved many prob­lems and are very col­le­gial and will­ing to share their material.
  9. Invest in tech. Not just devices, but infra­struc­ture so that roam­ing devices won’t choke when stu­dents bring them from math to lan­guage arts. And not just
    infra­struc­ture, but peo­ple who under­stand and can keep your net­work effec­tive. When you inter­view, try to find help­ful peo­ple who under­stand that teach­ers need to be pri­or­i­tized at the top of their list.
  10. Ques­tion, ana­lyze, fol­low up, lis­ten, revisit, refresh, check, repeat.

There’s plenty more of course. But this is a good list to start. What’s on your list? Please share. Also if you’re going next week to the Microsoft in Edu­ca­tion Global Forum in Barcelona please look for me and let’s talk.

- Pam Livingston

BYOD, Communities — and a 1-to-1 Webinar

When invited to visit 1-to-1 schools, I pose two over­ar­ch­ing ques­tions – How are stu­dents involved in 1-to-1 here? How is 1-to-1 grow­ing your learn­ing community?

These ques­tions become impor­tant with a pro­gram with school-supplied or school-recommended dig­i­tal devices – and even more so with BYOD pro­grams. Because if you are expect­ing every­one to sup­ply their own device for learn­ing, you need to:

  1. Make sure stu­dents are fully involved and onboard right away. Bring stu­dents into com­mit­tees and have them part of sur­veys and the plan­ning, ask their opin­ions as experts.  They reside in the dig­i­tal world and are your most impacted stake­hold­ers in terms of their cur­rent and future aca­d­e­mic, career, pro­fes­sional and per­sonal lives. And keep ask­ing them, many times – for­mally and infor­mally. Fol­low up on their ideas and sug­ges­tions. If BYOD is bought in as a strat­egy by the stu­dents who under­stand your respect and under­stand­ing of them and who real­ize the entire pro­gram was built with their buy-in and feed­back — you will have tee’ed up your pro­gram for success.
  2. Schools needs to be brought together with tech­nol­ogy not seg­mented into class­room silos of tech­nol­ogy. Teach­ers need to choose class­room tools – but the school should have an over­ar­ch­ing online com­mu­nity for social learn­ing where every­one can com­mu­ni­cate and col­lab­o­rate in whole-school groups, in whole-grade groups, in whole class­room groups, and in project-based groups. This should be the same social com­mu­nity not a dif­fer­ent one in each class­room, grade level, divi­sion, or school. Build and grow your online social learn­ing com­mu­nity with your stu­dents so they have uni­for­mity and con­nec­tiv­ity as they move through your edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tion – and so that teach­ers can have a place for their PLCs and adult pro­fes­sional dis­cus­sion forums year-after-year.

I’d like to invite you to join Lord Knight, Neus Lorenzo, Leslie Wil­son and myself to hear our thoughts on 1-to-1 The Next Wave and why we think we’re poised at this very moment for some excit­ing things on the 1-to-1 front. Sign up here: http://swrt.worktankseattle.com/series/34/seriessignup.aspx

- Pamela Livingston

1-to-1 – Now and Then

I’m prepar­ing for a trip to school in South Korea in the process of a robust 1-to-1 pro­gram and reflect­ing on the past 7+ years work­ing with schools tak­ing this jour­ney.  Here are some over­all observations:

1. It’s still about the peo­ple – the edu­ca­tors, the stu­dents, the par­ents, and admin­is­tra­tors – and mak­ing sure voices are heard, stake­hold­ers are brought into all con­ver­sa­tions. Deci­sions should start with these types of ques­tions – How will [stu­dents] ben­e­fit and par­tic­i­pate? How will [teach­ers] lead? How will [par­ents] sup­port? Then ask the ques­tions again but switch the stake­holder name.

2. Every pro­gram is dif­fer­ent – because each school’s mis­sion, cul­ture, and goals are dif­fer­ent. Ensur­ing align­ment to the school or dis­trict is key.

3. Stu­dents need to be empow­ered and should be part of the plan­ning and dis­cus­sions, and not just as the tar­get of the program.

4. There is no such thing as over plan­ning or over com­mu­ni­cat­ing. Plans will change and be fluid. Every­one will fill in the silence with their own inter­pre­ta­tion if there is not enough communication.

5. Hard­ware and soft­ware keeps get­ting bet­ter, more flex­i­ble, and eas­ier to use.

6. An online learn­ing com­mu­nity is vital  — one that every­one can access – to elim­i­nate unin­ten­tional silos of learn­ing, clut­tered email and frac­tured stu­dent experiences.

7. Fur­ni­ture is improv­ing – check this out: http://www.ideo.com/work/node-chair/

8.  Wifi is bet­ter but a net­work audit is still de rigeur. Most hard­ware ven­dors will help out with this at a low price in hopes of get­ting the contract.

9. Learner-centricity and per­son­al­ized learn­ing is what 1-to-1 is all about. What a plea­sure to see it writ­ten into so many school 1-to-1 plans.

10. Logis­tics still count; lap­tops still break; insur­ance is still needed; elec­tric­ity is a fact of 1-to-1 life.

11. Par­ents are our best part­ners; when they embrace 1-to-1 in their home prac­tices much of the bat­tle is won.

12. Relat­ing 1-to-1 to pre­vi­ous fac­ulty work can be a smart move. One school mod­eled their pend­ing 1-to-1 in part on dis­cus­sions with their fac­ulty sev­eral years back on “what is a 21st cen­tury class­room.” The ideas of their fac­ulty then became the impor­tant frame­work for pro­vid­ing lap­tops to students.

It’s so great to see that 1-to-1 con­tin­ues to flourish.

- Pamela Livingston

 

1-to-1, Flipped Learning, and Online Communities

When I was first speak­ing with schools about 1-to-1 not long after edi­tion 1 of my book (now in its 2nd edi­tion) was pub­lished, two big ques­tions were – Is your school/district wire­less? Are you pro­vid­ing stu­dents with email accounts?  Back then, not every school could respond to both ques­tions in the affirmative.

Now we are see­ing more ubiq­ui­tous devices includ­ing tablets, lap­tops, smart phones and the com­plex­ity that ensues. This pre­vi­ous post went into some of the issues faced by schools when intro­duc­ing BYOD; the com­ments pro­vide more depth and ideas as well. Any 1-to-1 or BYOD school is wired now as it would make so sense oth­er­wise. Nearly all schools and dis­tricts offer some type of email for stu­dents if they are 1-to-1.

Like many, I’ve become intrigued by the con­cept of flipped learn­ing – an idea even more fea­si­ble when stu­dents all pos­sess some type of device that is as mobile as they are and which is used to learn, review and syn­the­size con­tent away from the class­room fol­lowed by more indepth social, hands-on learn­ing when back in the class­room. To me, it’s all about learner cen­tric­ity – if done right. This is a great thing and what we have always wanted – the learner has the resources at his/her fin­ger­tips, learn­ing and tools for learn­ing are con­ti­nously avail­able – and the user-created arti­facts of learn­ing are orga­nized and avail­able to the learner at any time.

How­ever, the piece that is also needed is some type of online learn­ing com­mu­nity. Rather than email, which we all know has become a boon­dog­gle in our lives and which stu­dents are mov­ing away from in droves, an online learn­ing com­mu­nity can offer a safe, con­tained space for teach­ers and students.

I’ll be pre­sent­ing at NCCE on Fri­day, March 1 at 2:30 a ses­sion enti­tled “A ‘Cloud’ for Flipped Class­rooms” which is all about how imple­ment­ing flipped class­rooms, or really most all tech­nol­ogy inte­gra­tion projects, ought to have the cor­ner­stone of an online learn­ing com­mu­nity. The ben­e­fits of a learn­ing com­mu­nity include:

  • Pro­vid­ing a cen­tral space for learn­ing that extends the classroom
  • Elim­i­nat­ing “Web 2.0 site of the week” syn­drome which results in
    • login fatigue (try­ing to remem­ber which ID and pass­word to use) result­ing from all the dif­fer­ent applications
    • frac­tured stu­dent expe­ri­ences (hav­ing mul­ti­ple inter­faces to know and navigate)
  • Pre­vent­ing email clutter
    • Rather than the teacher main­tain­ing lists of inter­nal or exter­nal emails, the com­mu­nity uses its own inter­nal messaging
    • Mes­sag­ing can include send­ing stu­dent doc­u­ments, mark­ing them up, and return­ing to the stu­dent via attach­ments – track­able and centralized
  • Threaded dis­cus­sions
    • Real dis­cus­sions can occur and be followed
    • Pro­motes collaboration
      • Stu­dents can work as a whole class or in smaller groups with teacher oversight
  • Increased stu­dent accountability
    • No lost paper – the Inter­net is every­where – even at McDonald’s!
    • Date and time is stamped with work turned in
  • Shared resources
    • Every­one sees the links, the resources, the pho­tos, pod­casts, etc.
    • Assign­ment post­ing, turn­ing in
      • The assign­ments and the work are centralized
      • Class cal­en­dar
        • A cal­en­dar for the class is avail­able to view events, assign­ments, assess­ments, etc.
  • Easy inter­faces
    • Stu­dents use social media now and most online com­mu­ni­ties emu­late this
  • A safe place to learn dig­i­tal citizenship
    • Prac­tic­ing how to be a good dig­i­tal cit­i­zen­ship using social media in a class­room com­mu­nity can pro­vide real exam­ples of what to do and what not to do, along with teach­able moments
      • Teach­ers may wish to imple­ment “L.A.R.K.” a con­cept from my book
        • Dig­i­tal learn­ing should be L — Legal (adher­ing to copy­right and other laws) A — Appro­pri­ate (images and ideas should not be offen­sive) R — Respon­si­ble (tak­ing care of dig­i­tal tools and resources) K — Kind (know­ing how to respect and be kind to every­one in a community)

Full dis­clo­sure: I man­age a great (IMHO!) prod­uct that does all this. But this list above applies in gen­eral as well. 1-to-1 needs an online learn­ing com­mu­nity to unleash its true potential.

Your thoughts and com­ments are welcome!

-        Pamela Livingston

Global Learning Webinar 10/24 — An Answer to “What to Do with 1-to-1″

1-to-1 is as good as what you do with it. If edu­ca­tors view this as a vehi­cle for crit­i­cal think­ing and 21st Cen­tury learn­ing skills, and are ready to allow stu­dents to roll up their sleeves and get deeply into think­ing, analy­sis, ques­tions, prob­lems, and ideas, 1-to-1 can offer the facil­ity, resources and tools to make learn­ing hap­pen in deep and mean­ing­ful ways.

An impor­tant man­i­fes­ta­tion for 21st Cen­tury learn­ing today is global aware­ness and under­stand­ing. The chal­lenge is for stu­dents to embrace our new global world, develop an under­stand­ing of other cul­tures, hone skills and increase knowl­edge of other ideas and peo­ple. 1-to-1 deep­ens this because stu­dent have at their fin­ger­tips paths to research­ing, com­mu­ni­cat­ing, shar­ing and col­lab­o­rat­ing online.

A leader in global learn­ing is Lucy Gray. I’d like to invite every­one to par­tic­i­pate in a free Webi­nar all about Global Learn­ing from Lucy who heads up the Global Edu­ca­tion Con­fer­ence. It will be Wednes­day 10/24 at 1 p.m. East­ern. Please sign up here and feel free to invite others.

Hope to see you there!

Pamela Liv­ingston

Why 1-to-1 — Scott McLeod — Free Webinar 9/26/12 1:30 p.m. Eastern

While the real poten­tial of 1-to-1 learn­ing is unleashed in the class­room with teach­ers and stu­dents, it takes a vil­lage to make this hap­pen. And every vil­lage needs a vil­lage leader with acu­ity. This is part of what Scott McLeod and Nick Sauers work on day in and day out — help­ing to con­nect the real­ity of 1-to-1 pos­si­bil­i­ties for learn­ing to the daily lives of prin­ci­pals, super­in­ten­dents, and other administrators.

Few peo­ple are as spot-on as Nick and Scott with knowl­edge, exper­tise, under­stand­ing and the abil­ity to com­mu­ni­cate to school lead­ers. They’ve walked the walk and know what lead­er­ship in schools involves because they are hands-on school lead­ers who have super­vised and lead many oth­ers in schools.

So I would like to invite all of you to a free Webi­nar this Wednes­day by Scott McLeod you can sign up for this week. It’s spon­sored by my com­pany, School­wires, as part of our thought lead­er­ship pro­gram. This pro­gram seeks out lead­ing edu­ca­tors and pro­vides a forum for their think­ing accord­ing to their exper­tise. It is not a “ven­dor” pre­sen­ta­tion, it is just a plat­form for School­wires to sup­port inno­v­a­tive and for­ward think­ing. I’ll also give a slide at the end reflect­ing on Scott’s ideas from the per­spec­tive of the Tech­nol­ogy Direc­tor (my back­ground for many years.)

Please sign up to join us this Wednes­day, 9/26 from 1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. East­ern at  ow.ly/dWv2K 

Hope to see you at the Webinar,

- Pamela Livingston

BYOD Questions to Consider

The buzz in 1-to-1 right now is about BYOD — Bring Your Own Device — and it’s not a fad and it’s not going away. There’s a con­ver­gence of fac­tors caus­ing it including:

  • Hard­ware is diverse and at price points that are more affordable
  • Schools are hyper bud­get conscious
  • The “cloud” (pre­vi­ously called The Inter­net, the Web and the Infor­ma­tion Super­high­way) is ideal for core apps which are free or inex­pen­sive with such as Google (although be sure to use GAFE), and Zoho
  • Par­ents are real­iz­ing that a dig­i­tal device is nec­es­sary for learning
  • Schools want to be sure stu­dents pos­sess 21st Cen­tury skills

But BYOD upsets apple carts right and left. We’ve been build­ing school infra­struc­tures for a long time that have sup­ported a data-centric model in that IT direc­tors allow or dis­al­low devices on the school net­work accord­ing to a set model which is partly about good design and sup­port, partly about sup­port­ing what already exists and partly about not tak­ing on new projects or approaches that require more work, resources, and skill sets. And I’ve been a tech direc­tor in schools so know first­hand that open­ing a can of worms when it impacts the net­work, the laptop/desktop stan­dard­iza­tion, and the hard­ware replace­ment plan is not some­thing many peo­ple will relish.

But then there are the stu­dents. They grow and develop and move to the next grade level and out the door to col­lege and to life. They need to be empow­ered and learn in an envi­ron­ment that encour­ages them to think and write and research and pub­lish and present and ana­lyze and cre­ate new ideas and solu­tions to prob­lems. They also need to own and under­stand the vehi­cles used for learn­ing. So this might mean BYOD.

In order for BYOD to work well there must be a strong part­ner­ship between admin­is­tra­tion, Board mem­bers, teach­ers, tech­nol­ogy, stu­dents, and par­ents. Every­one is going to be impacted by 1-to-1 no mat­ter how it is imple­mented, whether BYOD or a stan­dard hard­ware plat­form either pro­vided or spec­i­fied by the school or dis­trict. But with BYOD it’s likely you are going to see some push­back from tech­nol­ogy peo­ple because of the com­plex­ity, change, work, plan­ning and resources required. So here are some ques­tions to consider:

  • Have you vis­ited a BYOD school or district?
    • If not a team with rep­re­sen­ta­tive stake­hold­ers should do so armed with lots of questions
  • Are you already using Google or Zoho or some cloud solution?
    • With­out cloud apps BYOD is going to be nearly impos­si­ble to imple­ment in a mean­ing­ful way
      • You need the entire school/district com­mu­nity to be able to com­mu­ni­cate, pub­lish, present and share centrally
  • How will you define BYOD?
    • Will there be a min­i­mum device or specification?
    • Will smart­phones be one of the devices?
  • How’s your net­work — is it ready for
    • Wifi every­where with mul­ti­ple roam­ing wire­less devices
    • Cen­tral­ized data secu­rity (Bar­racuda, Light­speed, etc.)
  • How will you address logistics?
    • Will stu­dents be charged with keep­ing their devices charged, ready and safe/secure?
    • Will you have “loaner” devices?
    • Will devices be locked up somewhere/somehow dur­ing lunch, tests, sports?
  • How’s your curriculum?
    • Are teach­ers already used to assign­ments in Google and in using online social media tools so that stu­dent work is already free of hard­ware require­ments — and hap­pen­ing in “the cloud”?
  • How’s your dig­i­tal cit­i­zen­ship education?
    • Do stu­dents already know how to keep a respect­ful appro­pri­ate dig­i­tal footprint?
      • In my book I talk about L.A.R.K. — tech­nol­ogy use by stu­dents should be L — Legal, A — Appro­pri­ate, R — Respon­si­ble, K — Kind
  • How’s your com­mu­ni­ca­tion chan­nel with par­ents, students?
    • If the device is pur­chased, main­tained, repaired and man­aged by par­ents and stu­dents, it’s going to be impor­tant to com­mu­ni­cate often and well
  • How’s your budget?
    • Unless you have planned fully for the changes of BYOD you might be blind­sided by some upgrades or unex­pected costs so make sure to ask these ques­tions when you are vis­it­ing BYOD schools

There are ter­rific schools that have been BYOD for years, The Harker School in San Jose comes to mind for instance. Many peo­ple I respect have been writ­ing about BYOD includ­ing William Stites who posted this blog post for Edu­ca­tional Col­lab­o­ra­tors early this year, Lisa Nielsen who wrote about debunk­ing BYOD for T.H.E. Jour­nal and a recent arti­cle in Dis­trict Admin­is­tra­tor starts with a quote from Lucy Gray who I respect very much — this entire arti­cle by the way is an impor­tant read. The Lap­top Insti­tute which is highly rec­om­mended will have threads this sum­mer in Mem­phis on BYOD.

BYOD can be a solu­tion if you do your plan­ning and home­work and try to fig­ure out up front exactly what you’re get­ting into and plan care­fully. You’ll want to be ready to rethink your net­work as not being about enabling a few mod­els of spe­cific con­trol­lable devices but instead as a path­way to the cloud where your school/district-wide learn­ing com­mu­nity resides.

- Pamela Livingston

1-to-1 and Creating/Publishing Something New

There is so much power and poten­tial in hav­ing every stu­dent have a dig­i­tal device avail­able for school or home use. It means hav­ing at the student’s fin­ger­tips nearly any resource for writ­ing, pub­lish­ing, research­ing, plan­ning, graph­ing, edit­ing, shar­ing, and col­lab­o­rat­ing.  It also means all these resources along with the files and work cre­ated by the stu­dent are com­pletely mobile and avail­able as needed. Teach­ers in 1-to-1 envi­ron­ments no longer need to dis­trib­ute resources and col­lect them later, and there­fore can relin­quish their roles as the sole dis­sem­i­na­tors of knowl­edge.  Noth­ing jump­starts student-centered learn­ing like 1-to-1.

Unless 1-to-1 hap­pens to be solely about hav­ing a device to fol­low along with a teacher.

There are schools where 1-to-1 is about a teacher using a pro­jec­tor and bring­ing up a work­sheet while stu­dents, using their own dig­i­tal devices, fol­low along at their own desks with their own elec­tronic copies of the work­sheets.  Where stu­dents do not have the oppor­tu­nity to explore or col­lab­o­rate but still face front in desks in rows, albeit desks with lap­tops or tablets on them.  Where teacher-centered learn­ing is auto­mated and facil­i­tated so that work­sheets aren’t handed out any­more but still are inte­gral to learn­ing.  Where stu­dents aren’t asked to be part of the plan­ning or the ideas of the school, in spite of being the stake­hold­ers with the most at stake in terms of their futures.

But there are also schools where stu­dents cre­ate some­thing new and dif­fer­ent and where teach­ers have adapted to the role of co-learner and where think­ing and projects and col­lab­o­ra­tion flourish.

It’s the nature of schools that mate­r­ial and con­tent must be learned so there is a place for dif­fer­ent deliv­ery and method­ol­ogy.  Some­times stu­dents do face front and there is whole class instruc­tion needed even in the most effec­tive and student-centered spaces.

But if 1-to-1 is totally and com­pletely, with­out excep­tion, in every learn­ing space about teacher-centered instruc­tion — is it truly worth the time, energy, and cost?

- Pam Livingston

synthroid online pharmacy synthroid online no prescription buy synthroid online valtrex online pharmacy buy valtrex online valtrex no rx zoloft cheap buy zoloft no prescription cheap zoloft can you buy lamisil online lamisil online without prescription lamisil online overnight prozac online no prescription buy prozac online without prescription buy prozac buy propecia overnight propecia online pharmacy purchase propecia order priligy online without prescription buy priligy online no prescription buy priligy online no prescription cheap lasix online lasix online no prescription buy generic lasix online buy generic tadalafil online buy tadalafil online tadalafil online no prescription buy retin-a online without a prescription retin-a online without prescription retin-a online pharmacy cheap sildenafil online sildenafil online without prescription buy sildenafil cheap online order strattera online buy strattera online buy strattera no prescription buy neurontin online with mastercard neurontin online pharmacy order neurontin online without prescription buy cheap nolvadex nolvadex online without prescription buy generic nolvadex can you buy zovirax online zovirax online no prescription buy zovirax