Anytime, anywhere learning

Many in the one-to-one com­mu­nity, myself included, often throw around the phrase “any­time, any­where learn­ing.”  The phrase reflects the many learn­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties avail­able to stu­dents when they are given a ubiq­ui­tous learn­ing device.  One-to-one pro­vides stu­dents with the oppor­tu­nity to col­lab­o­rate with oth­ers, research top­ics of inter­est (as well as not so inter­est­ing top­ics), and cre­ate any­where at any­time.  I recently read Fred Bra­mante and Rose Colby’s book Off the Clock: Mov­ing Edu­ca­tion from Time to Com­pe­tency.  The book REALLY pushed my think­ing on what any­time, any­where learn­ing could look like.  In fact, it helped me real­ize how  my pre­vi­ous def­i­n­i­tion of “any­time, any­where learn­ing” only rec­og­nized a small part of the poten­tial of that type of learn­ing.  A major theme through­out the book was that schools need to move away from equat­ing learn­ing with time, and instead equate learn­ing with com­pe­tency.  Some stu­dents will nat­u­rally need more time to achieve com­pe­tency while oth­ers will need less time than pro­vided in our cur­rent sys­tem. Most edu­ca­tors don’t seem to dis­agree with this theme.  Many would agree that the Carnegie unit is out­dated, and doesn’t make much sense today.  Of course, the change to a true com­pe­tency based model involves changes to school and pos­si­bly state poli­cies. A sec­ond theme through­out the book focused on how and where that com­pe­tency based model was deliv­ered. This part would likely get much more push back from many edu­ca­tors.  The authors spent a great deal of time focus­ing on how learn­ing could look dras­ti­cally dif­fer­ent.  Learn­ing could take place through­out the com­mu­nity, and it could be deliv­ered by mul­ti­ple indi­vid­u­als.  The exam­ples below are a com­bi­na­tion of my ideas, and those of the authors.

  • Online learn­ing that includes courses with uni­ver­si­ties, and pro­grams such as Rosetta Stone.
  • Credit to stu­dents who spend time in a for­eign country.
  • Intern­ships with busi­nesses or non-profits in the community.
  • Credit for stu­dents who par­tic­i­pate in extracur­ric­u­lar activ­i­ties in the arts and sports, and even those not directly con­nected to school.  Expe­ri­ences my include mem­ber­ship in a band or par­tic­i­pa­tion in a com­mu­nity sports team.
The authors wrote about how teach­ing would shift from a direct instruc­tion teacher role to the role of a facil­i­ta­tor.  As facil­i­ta­tors of learn­ing, teach­ers would be respon­si­ble for help­ing orga­nize and over­see learn­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for stu­dents.  After com­plet­ing the book, the themes described above left me with two take­aways for educators.
  1. Schools should strongly con­sider mov­ing to a com­pe­tency based sys­tem of learn­ing.  Although there may be chal­lenges imple­ment­ing, that type of sys­tem just makes sense.
  2. Schools should look for engag­ing learn­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties out­side of the school.  This may cer­tainly be more chal­leng­ing for schools because of state reg­u­la­tions regard­ing seat time.
The dra­matic sug­ges­tions in the book could cer­tainly be huge game chang­ers for schools want­ing to truly rein­vent learn­ing. Read­ing the book could gen­er­ate great con­ver­sa­tions about rethink­ing edu­ca­tion, and I would rec­om­mend read­ing the book with oth­ers in your school.  Good luck and enjoy!

Photo Credit: Bom­bardier on Flickr

Nick Sauers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*