Archive for January 2012

Keeping Students Engaged in a 1:1 Project-Based Classroom [guest post]

Image approved for copy by Cre­ative Commons.

Source: http://bit.ly/vYUkXB

 

When lap­tops first arrived in my class­room, I wor­ried about class­room man­age­ment. How could I cre­ate an envi­ron­ment where stu­dents used their com­put­ers as tools rather than toys?

I was wor­ried for noth­ing. The fol­low­ing are sug­ges­tions for keep­ing stu­dents engaged in a project and account­able for their time with computers:

Stu­dents make a plan.

Stu­dents are most tempted to open wid­gets, games, and social chats when they are faced with a blank screen and have no plan.

Much of the time, stu­dents think they have a plan. If you ask them What are you going to do?, the answer is usu­ally I’m gonna make a Power Point about… or I want to make a movie about… Those answers indi­cate that stu­dents are think­ing of tech­nol­ogy before content.

Instead, ask What are you try­ing to learn? or What are you try­ing to com­mu­ni­cate? or What are you work­ing on as a writer? Those ques­tions get answers like I want to know more about the horses that Civil War gen­er­als rode or I want to con­vince peo­ple that Justin Bieber is the best singer ever or I’m try­ing to describe the character’s actions.

When you ask about learn­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion, you are sig­nal­ing that the con­tent is more impor­tant than the tech­nol­ogy. Pull aside those who are strug­gling with plans. Let them talk together and encour­age them to sketch their ideas with dia­grams or bul­let points and return to the com­puter later. Stu­dents with a plan tend to stay on task.

Stu­dents set time-bound goals.

Once stu­dents have a plan, they break the project into smaller tasks that can be fin­ished in 10– to 15-minute chunks of time. Have stu­dents write the spe­cific tasks on Post-it notes. Post-its are set beside the com­puter. On their Post-its, stu­dents fin­ish the sen­tence, “In the next [x-amount of] min­utes, I plan to…” They gen­er­ally write things like…

  • Cre­ate an out­line for my essay
  • Write my introduction
  • Find three pic­tures about…
  • Do my voice recording
  • Fin­ish four slides of my Power Point/Keynote
  • Find at least three data­base arti­cles on…
  • Draft at least three paragraphs
  • Use Google docs to peer-edit so-and-so’s essay
  • Upload my story to Voicethread

Tasks should be spe­cific. I’m gonna work on my project is not spe­cific enough. At the end of class, Post-its become “exit slips”. Stu­dents tick off the tasks they have com­pleted and hand the Post-its to the teacher so the teacher can see the progress.

Lap­top screens are “fisted” or “put at half mast”. 

Teach­ers don’t lec­ture much in a project-based learn­ing envi­ron­ment. How­ever, some­times stu­dent work time is inter­rupted so the teacher can give reminders or clar­ify directions.

Ask stu­dents to “fist” their com­puter (or “put the screen at half mast”). Screens should be gen­tly low­ered so that stu­dents’ fists fit between the edge of the track pad and the screen.

When screens are fisted, stu­dents are not dis­tracted by items on their screen nor can they type. At the same time, stu­dents do not lower their screens to the point that the com­put­ers go to sleep. In an iPad envi­ron­ment, stu­dents might care­fully face their screens down on the desk.

Fin­gers indi­cate the amount of time stu­dents need to com­plete a shorter task.

Some tasks are shorter and need to be com­pleted within a few min­utes of class. After stu­dents have worked for a rea­son­able amount of time, ask stu­dents to show fin­gers for how many addi­tional min­utes they need. Fisted com­put­ers sig­nal completion.

If a stu­dent is far behind the rest of the class, try to deter­mine whether the stu­dent got dis­tracted or if the stu­dent needs reteach­ing. Have the stu­dent take a screen­shot of his or her progress. Screen­shots are help­ful to guide future conversations.

Cir­cu­late the room, con­fer­enc­ing with students.

Walk­ing and talk­ing with stu­dents is impor­tant with or with­out com­put­ers. In her arti­cle 10 Ways to be a Ter­ri­ble Teacher, Vicki Davis describes the ter­ri­ble teacher as one who is work­ing on his or her own com­puter and not pay­ing atten­tion to students.

Stu­dents wel­come teacher con­ver­sa­tion. They are eager to share their progress and request advice when they’re stuck. You build rela­tion­ships with stu­dents when you talk to them about their work.

Rather than ban­ning chat, teach stu­dents how to use it for collaboration.

Chat fea­tures are pro­grammed into Gmail and Google prod­ucts. The first year, I banned chats. Then, I real­ized that chats can be used for stu­dent collaboration.

I glance at the chat win­dows as I cir­cu­late the room. Since stu­dents have spe­cific, time-bound goals, most chats are used to ask peers to look over a para­graph or help with another aspect of the project.

Don’t be afraid to have tough con­ver­sa­tions with indi­vid­ual students.

Each year, I have to pull aside one or two stu­dents to talk about time man­age­ment. It’s not a puni­tive con­ver­sa­tion. The con­ver­sa­tion goes some­thing like this:

I’ve noticed you haven’t made much progress on…I need to know what’s get­ting in the way of your progress. I’m not ask­ing because I want to get you in trou­ble. I’m ask­ing because you’re now x-years old and I’m wor­ried that, if you get in the habit of…,then school will be really hard for you in the future.

Many of the sug­ges­tions above apply to project-based learn­ing envi­ron­ments both with and with­out com­put­ers. The trick in a 1:1 envi­ron­ment is to main­tain focus on learn­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Then let tech­nol­ogy nat­u­rally enhance those outcomes.

What tricks do you use to keep stu­dents engaged?

Janet Moeller-Abercrombie is the author of Expat Edu­ca­tor. She has 16 years of teach­ing expe­ri­ence and cur­rently works full time at Hong Kong Inter­na­tional School. Janet is a doc­toral can­di­date with the Uni­ver­sity of Min­nesota and has begun cur­ricu­lum con­sult­ing with admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers. She is cer­ti­fied by the National Board for Pro­fes­sional Teach­ing Stan­dards. @jabbacrombie

 

Creating a welcoming web presence

I have worked the past cou­ple of weeks on get­ting pre­pared to dis­trib­ute a sur­vey to teach­ers through­out the state of Iowa. Part of that work included vis­it­ing school web­sites and col­lect­ing teacher emails. With the help of a friend, I ended up col­lect­ing approx­i­mately 4,000 emails from 140 dif­fer­ent schools.  As you can imag­ine, the look and feel of those school web­sites var­ied greatly. My expe­ri­ence vis­it­ing those web­sites brought for­ward the fol­low­ing issues.

When I vis­ited web­sites, I often won­dered what the pur­pose of the web­site was.  I would guess that the pur­pose each school had for its web­site would explain some of the dif­fer­ences between web­sites. Most of the web­sites seemed to fit into one of two categories.

Sta­tic repos­i­tory of information-These web­sites were obvi­ously updated or changed very infre­quently. They con­tained forms and var­i­ous resources about the school. This would by far be the larger category.

Fluid infor­ma­tion source-These web­sites were updated fre­quently, and they con­tained cur­rent news about the school. Some included videos, pic­tures, and even twit­ter feeds.

This post isn’t intended as a crit­i­cism of schools, but rather as a con­ver­sa­tion starter. As a school, you need to decided where to spend your time and resources. Keep­ing an up to date web­site cer­tainly takes time. With that in mind, I’m going to end with a list of poten­tial rea­sons to invest in updat­ing your web­site and a list of the com­mon prob­lems I found on websites.

Why invest time to keep an up to date website?

  • Your web­site is the first place out­siders see when they look for infor­ma­tion about your school. This includes poten­tial employ­ees, new fam­i­lies, and com­mu­nity partners.
  • Your web­site can serve as a great way to share all of the pos­i­tive things hap­pen­ing in your school with com­mu­nity members.
  • The school can con­trol the infor­ma­tion on their web­site, and it can be a great way to address chal­leng­ing issues.
  • Mem­bers of the school com­mu­nity do want to be able to visit your web­site as a one stop infor­ma­tion warehouse.
Com­mon prob­lems and frus­tra­tions with school websites:
  • Out­dated infor­ma­tion! This was extremely common.
  • Bro­ken links were also quite common.
  • Lack of information-It was dif­fi­cult to find infor­ma­tion and con­tact emails for staff members.
  • Infor­ma­tion that was chal­leng­ing to access-Most com­mu­nity mem­bers will be frus­trated if a click doesn’t get them to the infor­ma­tion they need.

Visit your own web­site and click around on var­i­ous resources. What mes­sage does your school web­site send?

Characteristics of 1:1 Schools and Communities

This is my first blog of the New Year, and first post for some time. I’d like to say that my depar­ture from blog­ging has been due to a trip to warm Phoenix to see my Hawkeyes play in the Insight Bowl, but unfor­tu­nately that isn’t the case. I’ve instead been work­ing on my dis­ser­ta­tion, which will attempt to ana­lyze the impact of one-to-one schools across the state of Iowa. Some of my ini­tial find­ings have been very inter­est­ing, but I share them with a dis­claimer. These are very pre­lim­i­nary find­ings, and I may be over­sim­pli­fy­ing them a bit. I am still work­ing to clean-up the data, but I thought these very crude results may be of inter­est to some of you. If you’d like to find out more, feel free to send me an email so we can chat (nck0208@gmail.com).

The ini­tial part of my study attempted to ana­lyze the char­ac­ter­is­tics of one-to-one schools. The goal was to iden­tify char­ac­ter­is­tics of one-to-one schools that were very dif­fer­ent (sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant) from non-one-to-one schools. Because I didn’t want the char­ac­ter­is­tics to be impacted as a result of a school going one-to-one, I used data from a year that schools were not one-to-one (2007). Here are some of those char­ac­ter­is­tics that were very dif­fer­ent between one-to-one and non-one-to-one schools.

It is impor­tant to stress a cou­ple of points with these data.

  1. I didn’t report items above sim­ply if one group had a higher median. They were only reported if there was a sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence. I actu­ally com­pared schools on nearly 100 dif­fer­ent char­ac­ter­is­tics, most of which didn’t show dif­fer­ences between the two groups.
  2. These results are NOT  results of 1:1! These data were col­lected prior to one to-one imple­men­ta­tion in an effort to describe the “type” of schools that were the first in Iowa to tran­si­tion to one-to-one (41 schools).
  3. I have over­sim­pli­fied these results a bit, and they aren’t yet finalized!
Char­ac­ter­is­tics of 1:1 Schools/Communities in Iowa
  • School and dis­trict enrollment-One-to-one schools were smaller.
  • Pupils per computer-Even prior to going one-to-one, one-to-one schools had more computers.
  • 11th grade pro­fi­ciency scores-One-to-one schools outscored non-one-to-one schools.
  • Stu­dent to teacher ratio-They were higher at one-to-one schools.
  • Teacher salaries-Salaries were lower at one-to-one schools.
  • Rev­enue from local sources-One-to-one schools received a greater per­cent­age of their rev­enue from local sources. (This may be a bit con­fus­ing to those of you not famil­iar with Iowa’s fund­ing formula.)
  • Per­cent of com­mu­nity mem­bers with a col­lege degree-The per­cent in one-to-one com­mu­ni­ties was lower.
  • Per­cent of com­mu­nity mem­bers in the labor force-The per­cent in one-to-one com­mu­ni­ties is less than their counterparts.
  • Median fam­ily income-Family income was lower in one-to-one com­mu­ni­ties. (Hous­ing val­ues were also less.)
  • Age of principal-One-to-one prin­ci­pals were younger.
  • Super­in­ten­dent expe­ri­ence in the district-One-to-one super­in­ten­dents had less dis­trict expe­ri­ence, BUT no sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence in over­all experience.
  • Diversity-One-to-one schools were less racially diverse.

Even with those dis­claimers above, I have found these results EXTREMELY inter­est­ing. There are some I cer­tainly would have expected, and oth­ers that were more surprising.

Nick Sauers