PD in a one-to-one environment

I was recently emailed the fol­low­ing ques­tion from an edu­ca­tor con­sid­er­ing the move to one to one.

 What have you seen as an appropriate/adequate/effective amount of PD for schools that have imple­mented 1–1?  (Before the stu­dents received the com­put­ers and thereafter.)

Pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment is cer­tainly one of the key fac­tors for suc­cess or fail­ure for one-to-one schools. My thoughts on this ques­tion are pre­sented below.

There doesn’t really seem to be an easy answer to this ques­tion. The best way to address this is really through a shift in mind­set. All PD should really strive to address ways to find the best tools than can enhance what­ever the PD focus is. It is pretty easy to argue that tech­nol­ogy is one of the very most pow­er­ful tools to do this.  For example…

  • If your staff is focus­ing on project based learn­ing, think of all of the ways that can be enhanced with tech­nol­ogy tools. The abil­ity to cre­ate grows expo­nen­tially with technology.
  • If your staff is focus­ing on rigor and rel­e­vance, tech­nol­ogy can also serve as a tool to pro­vide a much richer expe­ri­ence for students.
  • If your staff is focus­ing on stu­dent engage­ment, there are all kinds of tech­nol­ogy tools that can help engage stu­dents. (If you don’t know what they are, ask your stu­dents to help find them!)

These are just a few of the many ways that tech­nol­ogy can con­nect to pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment. There are other fea­tures that are impor­tant to con­sider when design­ing PD. I would rec­om­mend dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing PD. This should be dif­fer­en­ti­ated by skill level, but there also needs to be a time for con­tent alike teach­ers to con­verse with one another. The Tech­nol­ogy, Ped­a­gogy, and Con­tent Knowl­edge (TPACK) frame­work describes the over­lap of those three areas to achieve truly high lev­els of tech­nol­ogy inte­gra­tion. With­out those con­tent alike con­ver­sa­tions, some teach­ers may have a dif­fi­cult time bring­ing new tools into their spe­cific class­rooms. Although dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion is key, it is also impor­tant to develop a set of tools that are applic­a­ble to all edu­ca­tors. One way to think of this is as build­ing a com­mon foun­da­tion or knowl­edge for all teach­ers. In What School Lead­ers Need to Know About Dig­i­tal Tech­nolo­gies and Social Media, Pamela Liv­ingston and Chris Lehman posed a ques­tion with that theme in their one-to-one chapter.

 What are the essen­tial tech­no­log­i­cal tools that all teach­ers should know how to use?

A final focus I would stress for PD is to develop lead­ers within your build­ing who have the capac­ity to help lead PD and prob­lem solve with other teach­ers. Send those teach­ers to a con­fer­ence or two each year to stay ahead of the curve. Give them some time, maybe a half-day each month, to explore and play with new tech­nolo­gies. Although there is a time and place for “out­siders” to come in and help,  your dis­trict will be money ahead by devel­op­ing their own experts.

Schools fail­ure to invest in PD once they have moved to one-to-one is one of the most com­mon mis­takes I have wit­nessed at one-to-one schools. That lack of invest­ment can cer­tainly make the tran­si­tion to one-to-one a poor invest­ment as well.

Nick Sauers

5 comments

  1. Alice Barr says:

    In our dis­trict we have found that the longer we are one to one, more pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment needs to be offered, not less. The pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment needs to be dif­fer­en­ti­ated and staff dri­ven. Play and time are crit­i­cal fac­tors to mak­ing a one to one project sustainable.

  2. I find one of the major obsta­cles for teach­ers in 1:1 pro­grams is the belief that teach­ers have to fully under­stand the tech­nol­ogy before intro­duc­ing it to students.

    Last week, when some stu­dents fin­ished writ­ing pieces before oth­ers, I said to the stu­dents with com­pleted RDs, “I’ve been read­ing about paperrater.com. Can you run your papers through the free appli­ca­tion and tell me whether or not you think it is useful?”

    My 5th graders found things I may have never found on my own. I lis­tened to pairs say things like “Look! For a 9th grade paper this earns a C. Can we get a B?” and “I don’t under­stand why this is a grammar/spelling mis­take. Can you (fel­low stu­dent) help?”

    Stu­dents also found errors in the pro­gram feed­back. They decided they wouldn’t like com­puter sites to grade their papers but that the site was an okay tool for gen­eral editing.

    Kids can do some great things with tech if teach­ers can set them free within lim­its (in this case, my limit was to stay only on this site for the day– other lessons have dif­fer­ent parameters).

    PD is great. Some­times it’s more effi­cient to read about new tech options and allow stu­dents to rate them for use­ful­ness. This week, I’ll give stu­dents a choice of four online pub­lish­ing tools to see which they like best.

  3. Curt Rees says:

    Great post Nick. I espe­cially agree with creating/supporting experts within the build­ing. An ini­tial invest­ment in PD for the in-house experts will ben­e­fit your staff with knowl­edge and likely save you money by not hav­ing to always send other teach­ers away for train­ing since they can get it from a colleague.

  4. JL says:

    In my expe­ri­ence open­ing our 1:1 iPad mid­dle school, there are 2 truths that answer this question:

    1.) You need more time than you think & then you still need a lit­tle more time on top of that
    2.) You’ll never be ready, no mat­ter how much time you put into prepar­ing. At some point, you just have to jump in.

  5. Nick Sauers says:

    You make two excel­lent points that I agree with. I would add that the sec­ond point could refer to infra­struc­ture as well as PD. It seems that no mat­ter how much time is spent prepar­ing the infra­struc­ture, there are almost always glitches. Most schools are sim­ply not designed for a 1:1 envi­ron­ment. How­ever, prepa­ra­tion cer­tainly does help min­i­mize those glitches schools have with their infra­struc­ture dur­ing implementation.

    Nick

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

order valium no prescription valium for sale order valium overnight buy soma buy soma without prescription buy soma without prescriptions cheap diazepam online diazepam online pharmacy buy diazepam rx order phentermine online phentermine online pharmacy cheap phentermine no prescription buy tramadol no rx buy tramadol no prescription purchase tramadol order xanax overnight buy xanax online without prescription order xanax online ativan no prescription buy ativan online without prescription ativan no rx buy klonopin overnight shipping klonopin online pharmacy cheap klonopin no prescription order provigil online overnight buy provigil no prescription buy provigil online mastercard overnight buy ambien online cheap buy ambien online without prescription ambien no prescription