Archive for April 2011

Message for publishers

I was recently asked to make a very short video that would be shared at the con­fer­ence for the Asso­ci­a­tion of Edu­ca­tional Pub­lish­ers.  My response focused on the need for pub­lish­ers to change in some of the same ways that schools need to change.  Rather than sim­ply adding tech­nol­ogy to tra­di­tional prac­tices, I encour­aged them to think of ways to trans­form pub­lish­ing to help pre­pare our stu­dents for today’s world.  You can view my video below, or check-out my prezi for the pre­sen­ta­tion.  Feel free to add some of your own com­ments as well!


Nick Sauers

Free conference

The Spring FETC free con­fer­ence will be on Thurs­day and Fri­day this week.  The con­fer­ence is a 100% online edu­ca­tion tech­nol­ogy con­fer­ence.  I expect to be drop­ping in on the con­fer­ence for the next two days.  Ses­sions will also be recorded.  One ses­sion of par­tic­u­lar inter­est to me focuses on iPads in the class­room.  It seems that recently iPads have become a hot topic in 1:1 con­ver­sa­tions.  I cer­tainly have some con­cerns about the iPad as a 1:1 device, but I’m also inter­ested in learn­ing about some of the pos­si­bil­i­ties of the iPad.  Steve Dembo’s ses­sion on the topic, described below, is slated to include a Q & A section.

iThink iNeed iPads in the Class­room
*** Inter­ac­tive Q&A fol­low­ing the pre­sen­ta­tion***
Steve Dembo, Online Com­mu­nity Man­ager, Dis­cov­ery Education

Sure they’re bright and shiny, but are they really learn­ing devices? We’ll take a close look at how exactly these tech­nolo­gies are being lever­aged in the class­room and what the best Apps are for edu­ca­tional pur­poses. We’ll also explore some cre­ative ways that you can fund your own i-initiative!

Nick Sauers

Reflections on Iowa 1:1 Institute #i11i

Year two of the Iowa 1:1 Insti­tute is in the books, and over­all it seemed to be a huge suc­cess.  We had over 1250 par­tic­i­pants reg­is­tered and 130 dif­fer­ent ses­sions through­out the day.  There were also over 25 dif­fer­ent ven­dors at the event.

What went well:

This was truly a “grass roots” event.  We recruit, and even bad­ger, 1:1 edu­ca­tors to help make the event a suc­cess.  1:1 schools are espe­cially instru­men­tal in pro­vid­ing pre­sen­ters and even pro­jec­tors and speak­ers for the event.  I’d like to thank all of those indi­vid­u­als who pre­sented, or helped make the event a suc­cess in one way or another.

There was an extremely wide vari­ety of ses­sions through­out the day.  At any given time, par­tic­i­pants could select from 26 var­i­ous ses­sions.  We hoped that this gave every­body some­thing worth­while to attend all day.

The event included many of the top edu­ca­tional reform­ers in the state.  ALL of the major edu­ca­tion orga­ni­za­tions in the state were present.

The day pro­vided a great plat­form for rich and diverse con­ver­sa­tions for any­one who truly wanted to participate.

What we need to improve:

Once again we had inter­net prob­lems.  They weren’t as severe as last year, but they were still very prob­lem­atic.  We’re still work­ing on deter­min­ing exactly what hap­pened.  This is the sec­ond year we have indi­cated we would pay what­ever it takes to make things work, and the sec­ond year things haven’t worked.

Pro­vide more direc­tion for our roll-alike ses­sions.  Many groups really ran with this topic and had great con­ver­sa­tions.  Other groups were much more appre­hen­sive to get started.  Assign­ing facil­i­ta­tors may be a pos­si­ble solu­tion, although I really want to assure that these con­ver­sa­tions don’t become dom­i­nated by one individual.

We may want to con­sider exert­ing a bit more con­trol over ses­sion sched­ul­ing.  This could help avoid hav­ing time slots that are loaded with some of the high inter­est pre­sen­ta­tions, or sim­i­lar pre­sen­ta­tions dur­ing the same time slot.

Please feel free to leave com­ments with any thoughts, sug­ges­tions, or reflec­tions that you have for the day.  You may also email me directly at nck0208@gmail.com.

Nick Sauers

Iowa 1:1 Institute

I first need to apol­o­gize for my lack of post­ings over the past two weeks.  Trav­el­ing to New Orleans for AERA and prepar­ing for the Iowa 1:1 Insti­tute has greatly ham­pered my blog­ging!  With that in mind, I am EXTREMELY excited for the 1:1 Insti­tute tomor­row in Des Moines.

There will cer­tainly be a fol­low up post from the event, but here are two ways for some of you to vir­tu­ally par­tic­i­pate in the event.

  • Hashtag-#i11i (pound sign, lower-case i, num­ber 1, num­ber 1, lower-case i)
  • Resources from ses­sions–You will need to join this ning to access mate­ri­als, but that should be fairly simple.

If you are attend­ing the event, I would wel­come guest blogs about ses­sions from the event that you attended.

Nick Sauers

Planning on becoming a school of the future?

Cross posted on Cre­ative Tension

Some­thing very excit­ing hap­pened when our lead­er­ship team met for a lead­er­ship retreat to work on our vision for Graded. For the longest time we have been focus­ing on our 1:1 ini­tia­tive in the mid­dle school and amaz­ingly enough, dur­ing the entire retreat, tech­nol­ogy never entered the con­ver­sa­tion. We even framed our learn­ing around five of ISTE’s Essen­tial Con­di­tions to Effec­tively Lever­age Tech­nol­ogy for Learn­ing. The five that we chose were Skilled Per­son­nel,  Cur­ricu­lum Frame­work and Stu­dent Cen­tered Learn­ing, Ongo­ing Pro­fes­sional Devel­op­ment, and Assess­ment and Evaluation.

I think that we owe the National Asso­ci­a­tion of Inde­pen­dent Schools (NAIS) and their “A Guide to Becom­ing a School of the Future” for this accom­plish­ment. I highly rec­om­mend it as required read­ing for any school that is plan­ning for the future. I think that we spent so much time focus­ing on the core of a our school in the future, that it was just assumed that tech­nol­ogy would play a major role in the teach­ing and learn­ing process.

What does the guide have to offer?

The first sec­tion is enti­tled, “Mak­ing the Case for Schools of the Future”. Even if you don’t need con­vinc­ing, I sug­gest that you read it and share it with those who need to be convinced.

We can choose to adapt, accept­ing that we do not know this world as well as our chil­dren and look to them to help us learn. Or, we can be infex­i­ble immi­grants, focus­ing on how good things used to be. If we are to reach our chil­dren and help them learn, we must adapt, we must face the fact that our stu­dents are no longer the peo­ple our edu­ca­tional sys­tem was designed to teach.”

The sec­ond sec­tion is, “Essen­tial Capac­i­ties for the 21st Cen­tury”. We linked this to a cur­ricu­lum frame­work where the main cat­e­gories are Ana­lyt­i­cal and  Cre­ative Think­ing  and Problem-solving; Complex Com­mu­ni­ca­tion —Oral and Written; Leadership and Teamwork; Digital and Quan­ti­ta­tive Literacy; Global Perspective; Adaptability, Ini­tia­tive,  and Risk-Taking; Integrity and Eth­i­cal  Decision-Making. There are many frame­works out there that describe what stu­dents should know and be able to do. This is just one that pro­vides food for thought.

I love the third sec­tion and think that it is the core of the guide because it pro­vides schools with a vari­ety of mod­els and resources for change. It’s great that they start the chap­ter off by saying:

The inten­tion is not to pro­vide a for­mu­laic approach to the chal­lenges of teach­ing and learn­ing in our times but rather to encour­age explo­ration, inno­va­tion, and trans­for­ma­tion within each school in a man­ner that is con­sis­tent with the school’s mis­sion and the needs of its students.”

One can spend hours in this sec­tion explor­ing the ideas and the links to resources from a wide vari­ety of school and teach­ers. The Sto­ries of Excel­lence guide has exam­ples of class­room units where tech­nol­ogy is used (unfor­tu­nately, It looks like they have blocked it to non-members).  This is one resource that is teach­ing and learn­ing with tech­nol­ogy focused.

The authors iden­ti­fied the fol­low­ing uni­fy­ing themes:

  • The schools are aca­d­e­m­i­cally demanding
  • Project-based learn­ing, as an inte­gral part of the school’s pro­gram, is woven through­out all grade lev­els and disciplines
  • Class­rooms extend beyond the school walls, actively engag­ing stu­dents in the world around them
  • Dig­i­tal tech­nolo­gies and a global per­spec­tive infuse all aspects of the curriculum
  • Vibrant arts pro­grams help pro­mote cre­ativ­ity, self-expression, self-discipline, and fexibility
  • The adults are actively engaged with one another and with the stu­dents in a process of con­tin­u­ous learning
  • A cul­ture of engage­ment and sup­port invites par­tic­i­pa­tion, inno­va­tion, and a “growth mind­set” on the part of teach­ers and students
  • Trans­for­ma­tional lead­er­ship chal­lenges the sta­tus quo, draws out the issues, nav­i­gates through con­fict, and mobi­lizes peo­ple and resources to do the adap­tive work nec­es­sary to cre­ate and sus­tain effec­tive change.

Finally, the appen­dix has addi­tional resources to use in your planning.

If you haven’t stud­ied this guide, you’re miss­ing out. It’s a must in my hum­ble opinion.

Task Force 2012: our plan for using collaborative tools

Cross posted on Cre­ative Ten­sion.

While our mid­dle school has a 1:1 pro­gram in grades 6 and 7 our high school is plan­ning to roll out a 1:1 pro­gram in August 2012. We have cre­ated a 27 mem­ber task force com­prised of teach­ers, stu­dents, par­ents and admin­is­tra­tors whose job it is to get out in front of the learn­ing and to make rec­om­men­da­tions for the 2011 school year.  The task force lead­er­ship group decided to struc­ture the group, which has a Decem­ber — June lifes­pan, around these ideas and goals.

“We will strive to keep the learn­ing pur­pose­ful and the task force focused on cre­at­ing rec­om­men­da­tions (action plans) for the 2011 school year.” Goals

  • Develop recommendations/action steps for the high school for the 2011-12 school year. Rec­om­men­da­tions will be based on the Inter­na­tional Soci­ety for Tech­nol­ogy in Education’s Essen­tial Con­di­tions.
  • Share infor­ma­tion on 21st cen­tury edu­ca­tion with the Graded community.

The group meets monthly for four hour chunks of time so we real­ize the impor­tance of com­mu­ni­cat­ing and col­lab­o­rat­ing vir­tu­ally. There are three tools that we are rely­ing on heav­ily for com­mu­ni­ca­tion and collaboration.

1. Ning - The 2012 Task Force Ning is our hub for com­mu­ni­ca­tion. While there are 27 mem­bers of the task force, there are 56 mem­bers on the Ning. We have opened it up to our entire com­mu­nity. We started by post­ing notes from our ini­tial meet­ings in the dis­cus­sion forum and are encour­ag­ing video uploads, ongo­ing dis­cus­sions and blog posts. We use it as a por­tal for dis­cus­sions and an archive of our process. Recently, we asked our high school lead­er­ship team to review the Ning so that the mem­bers could gain a sense of what the task force is doing. While we’re never sat­is­fied with the level of par­tic­i­pa­tion, the amount of infor­ma­tion that has been gen­er­ated after 3 months is fantastic.

2. Diigo - We have cre­ated a group called Graded 21st Cen­tury that mem­bers can use to share web resources. Mem­bers can also share high­lights and notes with the rest of the group. We are find­ing that the long tale prop­erty  holds true with a very small num­ber of mem­bers con­tribut­ing mul­ti­ple sources. It will be inter­est­ing to see how par­tic­i­pa­tion improves over time.

3. Google Docs — We use Google Edu­ca­tion tools to col­lab­o­rate and present infor­ma­tion. These tools are avail­able 24/7 for mem­bers to use and we have a rich archive of information.

So, what have we learned in rolling out these tools?

1. Build­ing the Ning doesn’t mean that peo­ple will auto­mat­i­cally start using the tool. We found that we had to pro­vide sup­port to help the teach­ers, stu­dents and par­ents to get started. Send­ing the infor­ma­tion out via e-mail only worked for some of the participants.

2. Using the tools dur­ing the face to face meet­ings is a must. Aside from the obvi­ous rea­sons, this allows the par­tic­i­pants to dis­cuss the tools and they can get help, if necessary.

3. We’re work­ing with an out­side con­sul­tant and she is able to track our progress and par­tic­i­pate in the dis­cus­sions. On a recent Skype call with her I asked her to guess which direc­tion the group took in a recent meet­ing and she had already seen the work and was able to com­ment. It’s so effi­cient and effec­tive to have her linked in with our work.

4. Mak­ing a monthly post an assigned task has had mixed results. Some were more com­fort­able with expound­ing on their ideas that related to spe­cific online resources and oth­ers just shared resources on the Ning. We’re hop­ing that with feed­back and dis­cus­sion that post­ing will become a habit and that the qual­ity of the posts will improve.

5. We’re con­stantly look­ing for ways to increase the chat­ter on the Ning. We are opti­mistic that we’ll develop a cul­ture of online col­lab­o­ra­tion but it seems to be some­thing that we can’t give up on.

We’re very excited about the work that this group is doing and it will be excit­ing to see how this online cul­ture evolves. What sug­ges­tions do you have for us?

Staying connected

I’m writ­ing this post while on an air­plane as I’m head­ing to New Orleans for the annual AERA con­fer­ence.  As I sit here and strug­gle to find some­thing to write about, I’m forced to reflect on how depen­dent I am on being con­nected.  Some may see this as a bad thing, but not me.  In my mind, I real­ize how those con­nec­tions have helped me grow pro­fes­sion­ally in tremen­dous ways.

Con­sider this post a tip of my hat to those of you who have helped me build my skills through one of the tools listed below.

Twitter-Yes, I con­fess that after ini­tially being intro­duced to Twit­ter I thought it was stu­pid and only for the “real techies”.  Since that time, Twit­ter has turned into one of my best ways to get infor­ma­tion.  Any time I expe­ri­ence “writer’s block”, I log onto Twit­ter to see what my net­work friends are talk­ing about and what links/resources they have listed.

RSS-I use my reader account as a one stop shop­ping loca­tion for all of the best blogs and web pages that I find.  It is an extremely easy way for me to quickly scan what new infor­ma­tion has been posted.

These cer­tainly aren’t my only  lis­ten­ing sta­tions, but these have been invalu­able for me.

Nick Sauers

Teachers vs. technology

In an April 1 post on NEA Today enti­tled Lap­tops Are Not Teach­ers, author Tim Walker pits tech­nol­ogy against teach­ers. He talks about the state’s plan to “cut teach­ers’ jobs, salaries, and increase class size.” This post isn’t intended to weigh-in on the debate in Idaho. As a for­mer union pres­i­dent and teacher, I cer­tainly value the work of teach­ers. Unfor­tu­nately, Walker seems to be attempt­ing to make his point by devalu­ing tech­nol­ogy. The entire post high­lights many of the com­monly held beliefs that some edu­ca­tors have about tech­nol­ogy. I’ve hand picked some of those state­ments from the arti­cle that I’d like to address.

You sim­ply can­not replace a teacher with a laptop

Although this is a good sound bite, I think this is extremely rare in most schools.  It is cer­tainly pos­si­ble that online courses could even­tu­ally elim­i­nate some teach­ing posi­tions, but even in those cases there is still a teacher.  In actu­al­ity, a school may replace a face-to-face teacher with an online teacher.  For some schools this means increased effi­ciency and wider course offerings.

Replac­ing expe­ri­enced edu­ca­tors with online classes is undoubt­edly a risky move, espe­cially since the rush to do is not founded on reli­able research.

It is worth not­ing that a report for the Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion came to the con­clu­sion that “On aver­age, stu­dents in online learn­ing con­di­tions per­formed bet­ter than those receiv­ing face-to-face instruc­tion.”  Sure, the research cited may not be the golden stan­dard for research, but it cer­tainly is bet­ter than the “gut feel­ing” that online learn­ing can’t match face-to-face instruction.

Specif­i­cally, online classes and dig­i­tal tools could under­cut the need to take stu­dents’ indi­vid­ual learn­ing styles into account. Any ben­e­fits new tech­nol­ogy may bring would then be over­shad­owed by the dam­age done to stu­dent learn­ing and the teach­ing profession.

Many online edu­ca­tors would argue that online learn­ing more eas­ily allows for indi­vid­u­al­ized instruc­tion.  I also think that it is worth not­ing that if you take online learn­ing out of the con­ver­sa­tion, many edu­ca­tors would also argue that our tra­di­tional schools are doing a poor job dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing instruction.

My point in this post isn’t to say tech­nol­ogy should replace teach­ers.  Unfor­tu­nately, the NEA arti­cle in response to Idaho schools Super­in­ten­dent Tom Luna’s reform effort made this debate about com­put­ers ver­sus teach­ers.  In that effort, the arti­cle misses the mark by embrac­ing some of the tech­nol­ogy myths men­tioned above that are ques­tion­able at best.

Nick Sauers

A video is worth a thousand words.….

At the end of the work­shop with Punya Mishra on Tues­day, he shared two videos with us.  His short two minute video response to the pop­u­lar Kaplan Uni­ver­sity  com­mer­cial is a great exam­ple of what I often write and speak about.  The three min­utes it will take to watch the two videos is well worth the time!

Orig­i­nal commercial

Punya Mishra’s response

There were some inter­est­ing responses to these videos on YouTube.  Some peo­ple argued that the for­mat did enhance the lec­tures because lis­ten­ers could stop, rewind, and/or fast for­ward parts of the lec­ture.  Some­one also made the point that access to a lec­ture could be enhanced through var­i­ous tech­nolo­gies.  I don’t dis­agree with any of those points, but I would argue that the exam­ple in the com­mer­cial isn’t using tech­nol­ogy as a game changer.  Instead, it is using tech­nol­ogy to tweak and pro­mote our cur­rent sys­tem of teach­ing and learn­ing which is too fre­quently not engag­ing for students.

Nick Sauers

synthroid online pharmacy synthroid online no prescription buy synthroid online valtrex online pharmacy buy valtrex online valtrex no rx zoloft cheap buy zoloft no prescription cheap zoloft can you buy lamisil online lamisil online without prescription lamisil online overnight prozac online no prescription buy prozac online without prescription buy prozac buy propecia overnight propecia online pharmacy purchase propecia order priligy online without prescription buy priligy online no prescription buy priligy online no prescription cheap lasix online lasix online no prescription buy generic lasix online buy generic tadalafil online buy tadalafil online tadalafil online no prescription buy retin-a online without a prescription retin-a online without prescription retin-a online pharmacy cheap sildenafil online sildenafil online without prescription buy sildenafil cheap online order strattera online buy strattera online buy strattera no prescription buy neurontin online with mastercard neurontin online pharmacy order neurontin online without prescription buy cheap nolvadex nolvadex online without prescription buy generic nolvadex can you buy zovirax online zovirax online no prescription buy zovirax