1:1, Digital Distraction, & Internet Inattention

attentionA num­ber of recent media pieces, includ­ing two arti­cles in
the Wash­ing­ton Post (March
 and April
) describ­ing col­lege pro­fes­sor back­lash against stu­dent note­book PCs in
class, give me pause as I con­tinue to move my mid­dle school toward a 1:1
stu­dent com­put­ing program. (Last Mon­day, our Upper School Divi­sion Head
and I [Direc­tor of IT] pre­sented an update on our draft 1:1 stu­dent com­put­ing
pro­posal to the full school Board, bring­ing us one step closer to

Uni­ver­si­ties have been bell­wethers in the use of infor­ma­tion
tech­nol­ogy in edu­ca­tion, hav­ing led the adop­tion of com­put­ers, com­puter
net­works, the Inter­net, wire­less net­works, and wide­spread stu­dent lap­top
pro­grams, but these arti­cles describe a rebuff of com­put­ing technology’s
grow­ing pop­u­lar­ity. Has the pen­e­tra­tion of IT in edu­ca­tion out­stripped its
effec­tive use? Are we see­ing the early warn­ing signs of an insti­tu­tional
rejec­tion of mobile com­put­ing in education?

Nor­mally, I would dis­miss the Post arti­cles as mere
news-mongering, ped­dling iso­lated if sen­sa­tional inci­dents such as the physics
pro­fes­sor who shat­tered a liq­uid nitro­gen frozen lap­top to announce his ban
How­ever, hav­ing also expe­ri­enced uni­ver­sity hos­til­ity toward stu­dent note­book
PCs first-hand, I am inclined to refrain from dis­miss­ing these arti­cles
out-of-hand. A few of pro­fes­sors in my own Mas­ters pro­gram at the Uni­ver­sity of
Chicago have dis­al­lowed stu­dent com­put­ers in their classes for the same rea­sons
cited in the Post arti­cles. One included an entire read­ing
in the course packet to explain his stance. Thank­fully, in my pro­gram, unlike
the U of C law school, where Inter­net access
has been banned
, such restric­tions have been the excep­tion. (Nick Sauers
has pro­vided com­men­tary on more recent law school lap­top bans on this blog already.)

Hav­ing seen the mas­sive invest­ment
in cam­pus com­puter net­works and the rise of note­book com­puter pro­grams at many
schools, and hav­ing per­son­ally used a note­book PC in class as a stu­dent for the
past 20 years—since I was a senior in high school—I have been some­what
dumb­founded by this turn.

Of course, my pre-WiFi, pre-World
Wide Web, mono­chrome Tandy 1100FD
offered far fewer oppor­tu­ni­ties for dis­trac­tion for me in my high school and
col­lege classes than do even today’s lowli­est net­books or smart­phones. I had
the advan­tage of build­ing my in-class com­put­ing habits on a com­par­a­tively
bor­ing plat­form. Com­puter tech­nol­ogy has changed, how­ever, and given my own first-hand
expe­ri­ence of the dis­trac­tion fac­tor offered by wire­less note­book PCs in
classes, I do under­stand the moti­va­tion behind the bans, even if I do not agree
with the tac­tic. The lure of instant Google grat­i­fi­ca­tion of any stray thought
dur­ing an oth­er­wise unin­ter­est­ing lec­ture is pretty pow­er­ful. While I use my tablet PC in class
for tak­ing notes and ref­er­enc­ing class e-texts, I admit to hav­ing suc­cumbed to
check­ing e-mail dur­ing lec­tures that did not engage my full atten­tion. I have
had the pres­ence of mind to avoid the egre­gious exam­ples of on-line shop­ping,
instant mes­sag­ing, social net­work­ing, and gam­ing that are cited in the back­lash
arti­cles. I am a mid-life adult, how­ever, not a late-adolescent col­lege stu­dent
still devel­op­ing the impulse con­trol sys­tems of my pre-frontal cor­tex. As a
result, I may be slightly bet­ter able to resist the itch to update Face­book when
faced with a dry lec­ture on finance. More impor­tantly, I am not—like the
stu­dents for whom I am plan­ning a 1:1 program—a pre-adolescent even fur­ther
back on that devel­op­men­tal path.

That devel­op­men­tal issue is the
one that gives me the great­est pause. While the premise of 1:1 pro­grams is to
make learn­ing more inter­ac­tive, engag­ing, and effec­tive than tra­di­tional
class­room lec­tures and activ­i­ties, I worry that they may instead train our stu­dents
for the sort computer-enabled dis­trac­tion, inat­ten­tion, and escapism
exem­pli­fied in the back­lash arti­cles. On a broader soci­etal level, such wor­ries
have got­ten press in recent New York
Times arti­cles
high­light­ing the distraction-addiction-dark side of Inter­net
tech­nol­ogy. Nicholas Carr sparked the con­ver­sa­tion about the down­side of the
Inter­net with his thought-provoking Atlantic Monthly arti­cle “Is
Google Mak­ing Us Stu­pid?
”, which he has now expanded into a book. Of
course, I have not the time to read it (as if to prove his point ;-), so my
under­stand­ing of the brain changes induced by Inter­net use and the
well-documented pro­duc­tiv­ity drops attend­ing mul­ti­task­ing come from the
syn­op­tic Wired arti­cle.

Touch­ing on sim­i­lar ground, Philip
Zombardo’s RSA Animate-enhanced TED Talk on The Secret Pow­ers of
at one point argues that the 10,000 hours of video games played by the typ­i­cal Amer­i­can
boy by the time he turns 21 traps him in the mode of instant gratification/present-hedonism and wires his brain for an always engag­ing, con­trol­lable, immer­sive vir­tual exis­tence mal­adapted to
tra­di­tional class­room learn­ing, exac­er­bat­ing our nation’s school drop-out
prob­lem. While I am not con­vinced that heavy expo­sure to infor­ma­tion tech­nol­ogy
nec­es­sar­ily ends in an inevitable night­mare of self-destructive
present-hedonism, I think the propen­sity for Internet-inattention is real. So is
1:1 com­put­ing the rem­edy for that home/school dis­con­nect, mak­ing school more
engag­ing, allow­ing it to com­pete with richer, more engag­ing expe­ri­ences out­side of school through more
inter­ac­tive tech­nol­ogy? Or is it sim­ply another dose of dis­trac­tion and easy

I do not pro­fess to know the answer to those ques­tions, but
sev­eral things occur to me as I reflect on this issue. First, this dis­tract­ing
tech­nol­ogy shows no signs of dimin­ish­ing, only of becom­ing more immer­sive, com­pelling,
and ubiq­ui­tous. To remain rel­e­vant, schools need to deal with that real­ity.
Sec­ond, con­trol of atten­tion is cen­tral to suc­cess. In the short-term, stud­ies
show that multi-tasking is less effi­cient than single-tasking, by up to 40%. In the
long-term, con­trol of atten­tion is linked to the devel­op­ment of exec­u­tive
func­tion­ing and the self-regulation skills so vital to suc­cess in life. Third, in
embrac­ing class­room com­put­ing, schools have the oppor­tu­nity to teach stu­dents how
to develop their self-control to deal with dig­i­tal dis­trac­tions. Pri­mary and
sec­ondary schools have much greater lever­age than do col­leges in guid­ing
stu­dent class­room behav­ior. Nick Sauers has cov­ered class­room man­age­ment in the
con­text of 1:1 pro­grams in his post “Ban Bore­dom
not lap­tops
” on this blog. The teacher’s art of effec­tive class­room
man­age­ment will become even more impor­tant as tech­nol­ogy pro­gres­sively moves
into schools. Sim­i­larly, and more sig­nif­i­cantly, this envi­ron­ment requires
increas­ing empha­sis on devel­op­ing stu­dents’ metacog­ni­tive reg­u­la­tion, exec­u­tive
func­tion­ing, and emo­tional self-management.

How can we help stu­dents develop strate­gies for con­trol­ling their
atten­tion given the dig­i­tal dis­trac­tions to which stu­dents are every­where exposed?
What is your school doing? 


  1. Nick:
    Great blog post. Lap­tops don’t fit in classrooms…traditional ones that is…you’re talk­ing about a lec­ture, a mode of infor­ma­tion deliv­ery that for stu­dents you iden­tify “as mal­adapted to tra­di­tional class­room learn­ing.“
    Therein lies the prob­lem. The lap­tops don’t fit and we are slow to change sys­tem­i­cally.
    I am con­vinced a multi-layered approach to teach­ing, cen­tered around online course deliv­ery, could be our best tran­si­tional approach.
    As to what we are doing in our school? We are wide open with one-to-one, block­ing face­book, but lit­tle else. We use remote desk­top to seek out teach­able moments for stu­dents who are way off task, but find­ing that if you give stu­dents time to engage a well-planned les­son or activ­ity, they will get back on task more than enough to com­plete tasks.
    As a dis­trict we are learn­ing as we go, pun­ish­ing those who abuse, but not restrict­ing the casual offender who, in most instances, have become dis­en­gaged due to the lack of imag­i­na­tion on the part of the les­son. Sure, even dur­ing the best lessons our kids stray to Craig’s List for cars, prom dress sites, and the lat­est music infor­ma­tion, but we have observed them get­ting back on task either by choice or an engaged teacher.
    You can trans­form a lec­ture hall with lap­tops, it can’t be done and they don’t belong there. But as col­leges are find­ing out, some stu­dents have fig­ured out they don’t belong there either and are find­ing other ways to get their “high ed”.

  2. Garth Holman says:

    I agree with Dominic-Traditional learn­ing vs. lap­top learn­ing. We have been a one to one school for 8 years–middle school. If you engage kids in learn­ing the vast major­ity will not “Surf”. The key is find­ing ways to use the lap­top each day in ways that keep stu­dents into the topic..Quick image searches for details, Vir­tual tours, off site skype lessons, elec­tronic note­books, and much more. Good teach­ing strategies–best prac­tices with or with­out lap­tops. Keep class engag­ing and fun for stu­dents.
    I also have learned the tra­di­tional method of stand­ing in the front of the room is not the way to go. I got a wire­less key­board and mouse and then teach from the back of the room, this way I can see every screen as we work. A small change the has a major impact on learn­ing. We are on vaca­tion at the beach, so I have to go before I get in trou­ble with the wife. But check out my blog on one to one at http://www.teachersfortomrrow.net

  3. Undundkeync says:

    Learn­ing how the phys­i­cal world works and explain­ing it to our­selves and oth­ers can come from a rich block cor­ner experience.I have a strong FEELING (not a fact) the truth is going to hurt a lot of peo­ple when this is all said and done.This device, along with the I9103 that we found a few months back, would be aimed at dif­fer­ent mar­kets as cheaper alter­na­tives to the I9100, just like the I9003 served as a cheaper alter­na­tive to the I9000.But there’s prob­a­bly a lot more poly­car­bon­ate wastes enter­ing the envi­ron­ment than epoxy resins, so it makes sense to find a good way to recy­cle those plas­tic goods before they degrade, releas­ing BPA. micheal kors canada cus­tomer ser­vice Even the vit­a­mins may not pre­vent erup­tions if you have genetic pre­dis­po­si­tions or hor­monal issues.To find the 99th prime, all you can do is make an ordered list of prime num­bers and count to the 99th.As an exec­u­tive, you will be expected to broaden the scope of the com­pany, so before even going in for the inter­view, it’s good to orga­nize ideas on how you intend to do just that if you’re accepted for the position.Maier, a trained econ­o­mist, must be right to con­clude that this sta­tis­tic is “proof that you can work bet­ter by work­ing less.” With video stream­ing becom­ing increas­ingly pop­u­lar in 2010, Qik allows you to stream video straight to the web for your friends and fam­ily to see while in action.this could dis­play you the finest mer­chan­dis­ing and most cel­e­brated Pan­dora jew­ellery that’s at cur­rent in vogue.Some Euro­pean are caved with “Pan­dora”, “Love” or some other writ­ten word on the sur­face of cores.You owe it to your future together to look beyond the price tag and see just what’s out there to choose from. cheap pan­dora jew­elry Why not avoid the con­fu­sion by select­ing jew­ellery that is a time­less fash­ion trend.So start your jour­ney of mem­o­ries of your life today and hint to some­one that you want a bracelet or go buy your first charm and bracelet yourself.For the most part it is a sym­bol of good luck and great fortune.But it also has mean­ings as a charm to pro­tect the wearer against sick­ness and bad fortunes.At some point, it’s hard to suc­cess­fully con­is­der that any movies war­rants hav­ing to endure. From hunt­ing to the kinds of tea, made from tea to tea char­ac­ter, old waves told us a lot, so I was enjoying.The explo­sion of the inter­net has made it eas­ier for aspir­ing artists to bypass the major record labels and build their careers on their own.These indi­vid­u­als located together in sev­eral styles such as Cover Footwear, Stitch­ing outs, Cor­dons, Botas and so on.While in South Amer­ica, Mycoskie was intrigued by the style of shoes worn by rural Argen­tineans, and he was equally appalled by the num­ber of chil­dren in third world coun­tries that do not have shoes of any kind. toms promo code In ang dulo ng isang Dr online suriin sa web ay mai­ha­hamb­ing sa loob dinamika para sa mahusay na, luma na payo.ProWorld has spent the last 12 years con­nect­ing vol­un­teers with Peru­vian locals to imple­ment com­mu­nity devel­op­ment projects in the Cusco and Urubamba regions of Peru.The stats are stag­ger­ing: 30,000 peo­ple live in just one land­fill in the Philip­pines, where chil­dren walk over bro­ken glass, syringes and debris.The fol­low­ing Eco­nom­i­cal Toms Shoe Out­let labor suc­cess­fully under the “bare” theme of seashore wedding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



order valium no prescription valium for sale order valium overnight buy soma buy soma without prescription buy soma without prescriptions cheap diazepam online diazepam online pharmacy buy diazepam rx order phentermine online phentermine online pharmacy cheap phentermine no prescription buy tramadol no rx buy tramadol no prescription purchase tramadol order xanax overnight buy xanax online without prescription order xanax online ativan no prescription buy ativan online without prescription ativan no rx buy klonopin overnight shipping klonopin online pharmacy cheap klonopin no prescription order provigil online overnight buy provigil no prescription buy provigil online mastercard overnight buy ambien online cheap buy ambien online without prescription ambien no prescription