Archive for June 2010

EduBloggerCon Resources

I’ve been try­ing to take notes and gather resources today as I sat through the ses­sions at EduBlog­ger­Con.  Hope­fully, I can find addi­tional resources to add to this post.  If you have some­thing you would like to add, please send me a link through Twit­ter (njsauers).

Be warned.……these notes are cer­tainly not complete!

ISTE 2010 part 2

I’m going to tag on Nick’s post yes­ter­day about ISTE 2010 next week in Den­ver. I know there are some of you out there going — there will be 10,000 plus tech-loving edu­ca­tors there, many of them from 1:1 schools.

If you ask most peo­ple after a con­fer­ence what the best part was, they will say, “the peo­ple I met and the con­ver­sa­tions I had in the hall­way.” There are ways to increase those odds!

1. Net­work — this is not the old back-slapping buy-you-a-drink net­work­ing. This is a way to lever­age online con­nec­tions into mak­ing new acquain­tances. Sign up for the ISTE Ning ahead of time and read some of the posts. There are dis­cus­sions, events, invi­ta­tions and more up there right now. Attend Edublog­ger­con (it’s not just for blog­gers) on Sat­ur­day and don’t be shy. Peo­ple do really want to talk to you, you just have to start the con­ver­sa­tion. You’ll be sur­prised at the instant, deep con­nec­tions you will have with some of these folks. Hur­ray! You are not alone in your vision for tech­nol­ogy in edu­ca­tion!
2. Exhibit hall — yes, even if you hate the “boat show” aspect of a big con­fer­ence like ISTE, there are gems to be found. Look for com­pa­nies that have real teach­ers and stu­dents to help show their prod­ucts — you can get straight answers from them.
3. Ses­sions — talk to the pre­sen­ters. 99% of the atten­dees at any ses­sion will rush out the door. If you loved the pre­sen­ta­tion, hang out and talk to the pre­sen­ter. They will most likely be happy to chat fur­ther (once they pack up and get out of the room.) Pre­sen­ters aren’t usu­ally scary peo­ple and love to hear great feed­back!
4. “Rock stars” — I hear this all the time — some­one tells me after ISTE that they saw me but didn’t want to join a con­ver­sa­tion because I was talk­ing to some famous edublog­ger. They thought that some­how they didn’t mat­ter as much to me or to that per­son. This is sim­ply crazy, these “rock stars” don’t see them­selves that way, most of them love to talk to every­one and don’t miss an oppor­tu­nity. If they are there, it’s to talk, oth­er­wise they would be hid­ing in their rooms! If you see a group talk­ing, just join in — that’s the fun of con­fer­ences. There’s every chance you’ll get swept up going to lunch or din­ner or some­where fun with great con­ver­sa­tion guran­teed.
5. Ses­sions part 2 — Don’t over-schedule your­self. There’s noth­ing wrong with a lit­tle down time, but don’t just go back to your hotel. Serendip­ity can be very reward­ing! Wan­der over to the Blogger’s Cafe or the booths ISTE always sets up for Social Net­work­ing, Vir­tual Worlds and other spe­cial inter­ests. It’s casual and usu­ally has good wifi — another bonus!

Oh, back to #1 — if you are there in Den­ver early, there is another pre-conference event on Sun­day called the Con­struc­tivist Cel­e­bra­tion that you should check out. There is a fee for this, but you get a LOT of stuff in return. It’s a full day work­shop focus­ing on cre­ativ­ity and com­put­ing, and how to use com­put­ers in authen­tic projects. For $60, you get hun­dreds of dol­lars worth of the best cre­ativ­ity soft­ware on the planet, all of it REALLY use­ful for lap­top schools, lunch, and a great event. Bring your charged lap­top and recharge your cre­ative bat­ter­ies. More info here.

And if you do get to the exhibit hall, there are two booths you should check out — con­ve­niently right next to each other. Gen­er­a­tion YES (855) will have local stu­dents talk­ing about how they help inte­grate tech­nol­ogy in their schools, and Intel (854) will be doing live pod­casts about tech­nol­ogy suc­cess sto­ries. The Gen­er­a­tion YES stu­dents will also be print­ing out busi­ness cards, so if you for­get yours, you can get some replace­ments. Stu­dents to the res­cue — as always!

There’s so much more I could go on and on — but I’ll save it, and hope you come up to me dur­ing the ISTE events and say hello. I’m on twit­ter as smartinez, and I want to talk to you!

Sylvia Mar­tinez
Gen­er­a­tion YES

ISTE 2010

I’m extremely excited to be head­ing out for ISTE tomor­row morn­ing.  Yep, I know, I’m a cou­ple of days early, but I thought I should try to expe­ri­ence Den­ver a lit­tle bit. 

My con­fer­ence week will begin on Sat­ur­day with EduBlog­ger­Con 2010 which will be held at the
Col­orado Con­ven­tion Cen­ter.  This con­fer­ence, which is not part of ISTE, is a social media in edu­ca­tion uncon­fer­ence.  The whole con­cept of an uncon­fer­ence was totally for­eign to me prior to a con­ver­sa­tion with Dr. John Nash as we were plan­ning for our 1 to 1 Insti­tute in April.  Wikipedia defines an uncon­fer­ence as:

… a facil­i­tated, participant-driven con­fer­ence cen­tered on a theme or purpose.”

After pop­ping in on some of our uncon­fer­nce ses­sions in April, I real­ize how pow­er­ful they can be.  Uncon­fer­ences are much more par­tic­i­pant dri­ven, and there is typ­i­cally lots more par­tic­i­pant involve­ment.  The EduBlog­ger Uncon­fer­ence will be awe­some, and I’m very excited for the con­ver­sa­tions that will take place there!

On Mon­day there is a ses­sion by Project Red that is of par­tic­u­lar inter­est to me. The ses­sion is titled, Rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing Edu­ca­tion: What We’re Learn­ing from Technology-transformed Schools.  Project Red has com­piled a great deal of data from tech­nol­ogy rich schools, and I’m excited to hear about some of the con­clu­sions they are mak­ing from that infor­ma­tion.  Project Red is also directly con­nected to the One To One Insti­tute

The CASTLE team (Yep, I’m part of that team) will present a 30 minute ses­sion at
ISTE Unplugged
on Mon­day morn­ing.  This ses­sion will cover the train­ing that we’ve been doing across the
coun­try to help boost school admin­is­tra­tors’ knowl­edge, under­stand­ing,
and skills as they work to cre­ate learn­ing envi­ron­ments that pre­pare
grad­u­ates for the next half cen­tury, not the last.  Please feel free to stop by and say hi!

I really hope to meet some read­ers of this blog and make con­nec­tions with lots of other edu­ca­tors through­out the con­fer­ence.  You can also fol­low me on Twit­ter at njsauers through­out the conference.

Nick Sauers

I’ve got to think of a new job title


I cringe a bit when I try to explain to
peo­ple what I do.  I usu­ally end up explain­ing that I am involved with
edu­cat­ing oth­ers about tech­nol­ogy in edu­ca­tion. The rea­son I am uneasy with
that descrip­tion is because I don’t believe using tech­nol­ogy just for the sake
of using it changes any­thing.  It feels like some peo­ple look at me as “that
guy” who thinks schools need to rush out and pur­chase the newest fad in
tech­nol­ogy.  I also cringe when I hear edu­ca­tors speak as if they have
finally “made it” and become suc­cess­ful once they have pur­chased a piece of
tech­nol­ogy.  Some peo­ple act as if schools will mag­i­cally change sim­ply
because tech­nol­ogy is thrown into classrooms.

With that being said, I believe that
the tech­nol­ogy avail­able today can allow schools to oper­ate in ways that have
been very dif­fi­cult in the past.  Stu­dents can col­lab­o­rate more eas­ily
with one another and oth­ers through­out the world.  Stu­dents can cre­ate
things in ways that are nearly impos­si­ble with old tech­nolo­gies.  Stu­dents
can assess infi­nite infor­ma­tion, which can allow them  to view events from
mul­ti­ple per­spec­tives.  Stu­dents can bet­ter syn­the­size and eval­u­ate
infor­ma­tion because of that wealth of information.


A post by Jeff
sug­gested four ques­tions to use when eval­u­at­ing tech­nol­ogy use in the
class­room.  Each ques­tion is very straight­for­ward.  They are worth
look­ing at if schools truly want to assess how tech­nol­ogy is being used.

  1. Is the
    tech­nol­ogy being used “Just because it’s there”?
  2. Is the
    tech­nol­ogy allow­ing the teacher/students to do Old things in Old ways?
  3. Is the
    tech­nol­ogy allow­ing the teacher/students to do Old things in New ways?
  4. Is the
    tech­nol­ogy cre­at­ing new and dif­fer­ent learn­ing expe­ri­ences for the

Many edu­ca­tors like to say that
stu­dents are using tech­nol­ogy in their class­room.  Just using tech­nol­ogy
isn’t enough.  I ques­tion the use of that tech­nol­ogy if the answer to
ques­tion four isn’t “yes”. 


Nick Sauers

Ban complacency, not computers

Col­lege lead­ers usu­ally brag about their tech-filled “smart” class­rooms, but a dean at South­ern Methodist Uni­ver­sity is proudly remov­ing com­put­ers from lec­ture halls. José A. Bowen, dean of the Mead­ows School of the Arts, has chal­lenged his col­leagues to “teach naked”—by which he means, sans machines. — When Com­put­ers Leave Class­rooms, So Does Bore­dom – Tech­nol­ogy – The Chron­i­cle of Higher Education

This is one of the sto­ries where you have to really, really need to read the whole
thing. Because at first glance first you think, “Oh great, another edu­ca­tor who hates
tech­nol­ogy and refuses to join the 21st century.”

But you would be wrong.

He’s not really
against tech­nol­ogy, he’s against being bor­ing, espe­cially being bor­ing
with Pow­er­Point. He thinks when stu­dents come together, the best thing
to do is have a con­ver­sa­tion. Let the stu­dents read the mate­r­ial, or
lis­ten to a pod­cast ahead of time. Use class time to talk, ask
ques­tions, and inter­act with the teacher and other stu­dents. He asks his col­leagues to “teach naked” — that is, with­out the prop of a slideshow.

Even though he is tak­ing com­put­ers out of class­rooms,
he’s not anti-technology. He just thinks they should be used
differently—upending the tra­di­tional lec­ture model in the process.

Aha! He’s talk­ing about ped­a­gogy, not tools. He’s against lec­tur­ing,
with or with­out slideshow accom­pa­ni­ment. And guess who he has to
con­vince about this — yes, those dig­i­tal natives, the stu­dents. Because what they really are is com­pla­cency natives. They are used to wait­ing pas­sively to be told what to learn, how to learn, and then repeat­ing it back.

But he’s tak­ing com­put­ers out of the class­rooms! Evil!

wait, keep read­ing. He’s remov­ing the fixed com­put­ers hooked to
pro­jec­tors. And buy­ing lap­tops instead. And unbolt­ing the desks and
replac­ing them with mov­able chairs and tables so the teach­ers and
stu­dents can adapt their class­room to suit their learn­ing needs. Oh,
hmm… not so crazy.

It’s a great les­son in the haz­ards of sloppy vocab­u­lary.
All “tech­nol­ogy” is not cre­ated equal. It’s not an equation:

Tech­nol­ogy = good; there­fore,
remov­ing it = bad

We have to be more pre­cise about this when we talk about lap­tops chang­ing learn­ing. What’s the
learn­ing envi­ron­ment where the lap­tops will be used? What do you believe about learn­ing? How is
tech­nol­ogy sup­port­ing those goals? How will teach­ing change to meet those goals?

Teach naked? Ok, got to give the guy credit for com­ing up with
some­thing catchy. Get­ting atten­tion for advo­cat­ing doing away with
lec­ture is OK in my book. A wor­thy goal for K-12 would be to pro­duce
stu­dents who aren’t com­pla­cency natives, who arrive at col­lege ready for deep dis­cus­sion, real learn­ing, and mean­ing­ful inter­ac­tions with other human beings.

Sylvia Mar­tinez
Gen­er­a­tion YES

Blog | Web­site | Twit­ter

21st Century tools for educators

of my work with CASTLE involves teach­ing tech­nol­ogy boot camps for
admin­is­tra­tors.  Last week we held
one of those boot camps for 30 admin­is­tra­tors. Teach­ing tech­nol­ogy tools is
only part of the work I do, but I have to say I enjoy watch­ing the excite­ment
as these eager learn­ers blog, tweet, and Skype for the first time.   Hope­fully,
the tools that we empower them with will help they move their schools forward.


of that work, and my own curios­ity, I am con­stantly scan­ning my Reader and the
web for new tools.  I recently came across an online book by Michael
Zim­mer that cov­ers many of the basic tools that we teach in our ini­tial boot
camps.  His books are
and can be shared with oth­ers.  His book, Tools for the 21st
Cen­tury Teacher, cov­ers a lot of what I would con­sider the basic tech­nol­ogy
tools for edu­ca­tors.  (I should men­tion his book is short, 17 pages, and
very easy to read.)  This would be a great book to pass onto edu­ca­tors for
a short sum­mer read.


Tech :-) Happy also recently posted 50
Sum­mer Sites for Kids and Teach­ers
.  Although you may not find all of
the sites help­ful, it is cer­tainly worth giv­ing them a quick scan.


happy sum­mer reading!


1:1, Digital Distraction, & Internet Inattention

attentionA num­ber of recent media pieces, includ­ing two arti­cles in
the Wash­ing­ton Post (March
 and April
) describ­ing col­lege pro­fes­sor back­lash against stu­dent note­book PCs in
class, give me pause as I con­tinue to move my mid­dle school toward a 1:1
stu­dent com­put­ing program. (Last Mon­day, our Upper School Divi­sion Head
and I [Direc­tor of IT] pre­sented an update on our draft 1:1 stu­dent com­put­ing
pro­posal to the full school Board, bring­ing us one step closer to

Uni­ver­si­ties have been bell­wethers in the use of infor­ma­tion
tech­nol­ogy in edu­ca­tion, hav­ing led the adop­tion of com­put­ers, com­puter
net­works, the Inter­net, wire­less net­works, and wide­spread stu­dent lap­top
pro­grams, but these arti­cles describe a rebuff of com­put­ing technology’s
grow­ing pop­u­lar­ity. Has the pen­e­tra­tion of IT in edu­ca­tion out­stripped its
effec­tive use? Are we see­ing the early warn­ing signs of an insti­tu­tional
rejec­tion of mobile com­put­ing in education?

Nor­mally, I would dis­miss the Post arti­cles as mere
news-mongering, ped­dling iso­lated if sen­sa­tional inci­dents such as the physics
pro­fes­sor who shat­tered a liq­uid nitro­gen frozen lap­top to announce his ban
How­ever, hav­ing also expe­ri­enced uni­ver­sity hos­til­ity toward stu­dent note­book
PCs first-hand, I am inclined to refrain from dis­miss­ing these arti­cles
out-of-hand. A few of pro­fes­sors in my own Mas­ters pro­gram at the Uni­ver­sity of
Chicago have dis­al­lowed stu­dent com­put­ers in their classes for the same rea­sons
cited in the Post arti­cles. One included an entire read­ing
in the course packet to explain his stance. Thank­fully, in my pro­gram, unlike
the U of C law school, where Inter­net access
has been banned
, such restric­tions have been the excep­tion. (Nick Sauers
has pro­vided com­men­tary on more recent law school lap­top bans on this blog already.)

Hav­ing seen the mas­sive invest­ment
in cam­pus com­puter net­works and the rise of note­book com­puter pro­grams at many
schools, and hav­ing per­son­ally used a note­book PC in class as a stu­dent for the
past 20 years—since I was a senior in high school—I have been some­what
dumb­founded by this turn.

Of course, my pre-WiFi, pre-World
Wide Web, mono­chrome Tandy 1100FD
offered far fewer oppor­tu­ni­ties for dis­trac­tion for me in my high school and
col­lege classes than do even today’s lowli­est net­books or smart­phones. I had
the advan­tage of build­ing my in-class com­put­ing habits on a com­par­a­tively
bor­ing plat­form. Com­puter tech­nol­ogy has changed, how­ever, and given my own first-hand
expe­ri­ence of the dis­trac­tion fac­tor offered by wire­less note­book PCs in
classes, I do under­stand the moti­va­tion behind the bans, even if I do not agree
with the tac­tic. The lure of instant Google grat­i­fi­ca­tion of any stray thought
dur­ing an oth­er­wise unin­ter­est­ing lec­ture is pretty pow­er­ful. While I use my tablet PC in class
for tak­ing notes and ref­er­enc­ing class e-texts, I admit to hav­ing suc­cumbed to
check­ing e-mail dur­ing lec­tures that did not engage my full atten­tion. I have
had the pres­ence of mind to avoid the egre­gious exam­ples of on-line shop­ping,
instant mes­sag­ing, social net­work­ing, and gam­ing that are cited in the back­lash
arti­cles. I am a mid-life adult, how­ever, not a late-adolescent col­lege stu­dent
still devel­op­ing the impulse con­trol sys­tems of my pre-frontal cor­tex. As a
result, I may be slightly bet­ter able to resist the itch to update Face­book when
faced with a dry lec­ture on finance. More impor­tantly, I am not—like the
stu­dents for whom I am plan­ning a 1:1 program—a pre-adolescent even fur­ther
back on that devel­op­men­tal path.

That devel­op­men­tal issue is the
one that gives me the great­est pause. While the premise of 1:1 pro­grams is to
make learn­ing more inter­ac­tive, engag­ing, and effec­tive than tra­di­tional
class­room lec­tures and activ­i­ties, I worry that they may instead train our stu­dents
for the sort computer-enabled dis­trac­tion, inat­ten­tion, and escapism
exem­pli­fied in the back­lash arti­cles. On a broader soci­etal level, such wor­ries
have got­ten press in recent New York
Times arti­cles
high­light­ing the distraction-addiction-dark side of Inter­net
tech­nol­ogy. Nicholas Carr sparked the con­ver­sa­tion about the down­side of the
Inter­net with his thought-provoking Atlantic Monthly arti­cle “Is
Google Mak­ing Us Stu­pid?
”, which he has now expanded into a book. Of
course, I have not the time to read it (as if to prove his point ;-), so my
under­stand­ing of the brain changes induced by Inter­net use and the
well-documented pro­duc­tiv­ity drops attend­ing mul­ti­task­ing come from the
syn­op­tic Wired arti­cle.

Touch­ing on sim­i­lar ground, Philip
Zombardo’s RSA Animate-enhanced TED Talk on The Secret Pow­ers of
at one point argues that the 10,000 hours of video games played by the typ­i­cal Amer­i­can
boy by the time he turns 21 traps him in the mode of instant gratification/present-hedonism and wires his brain for an always engag­ing, con­trol­lable, immer­sive vir­tual exis­tence mal­adapted to
tra­di­tional class­room learn­ing, exac­er­bat­ing our nation’s school drop-out
prob­lem. While I am not con­vinced that heavy expo­sure to infor­ma­tion tech­nol­ogy
nec­es­sar­ily ends in an inevitable night­mare of self-destructive
present-hedonism, I think the propen­sity for Internet-inattention is real. So is
1:1 com­put­ing the rem­edy for that home/school dis­con­nect, mak­ing school more
engag­ing, allow­ing it to com­pete with richer, more engag­ing expe­ri­ences out­side of school through more
inter­ac­tive tech­nol­ogy? Or is it sim­ply another dose of dis­trac­tion and easy

I do not pro­fess to know the answer to those ques­tions, but
sev­eral things occur to me as I reflect on this issue. First, this dis­tract­ing
tech­nol­ogy shows no signs of dimin­ish­ing, only of becom­ing more immer­sive, com­pelling,
and ubiq­ui­tous. To remain rel­e­vant, schools need to deal with that real­ity.
Sec­ond, con­trol of atten­tion is cen­tral to suc­cess. In the short-term, stud­ies
show that multi-tasking is less effi­cient than single-tasking, by up to 40%. In the
long-term, con­trol of atten­tion is linked to the devel­op­ment of exec­u­tive
func­tion­ing and the self-regulation skills so vital to suc­cess in life. Third, in
embrac­ing class­room com­put­ing, schools have the oppor­tu­nity to teach stu­dents how
to develop their self-control to deal with dig­i­tal dis­trac­tions. Pri­mary and
sec­ondary schools have much greater lever­age than do col­leges in guid­ing
stu­dent class­room behav­ior. Nick Sauers has cov­ered class­room man­age­ment in the
con­text of 1:1 pro­grams in his post “Ban Bore­dom
not lap­tops
” on this blog. The teacher’s art of effec­tive class­room
man­age­ment will become even more impor­tant as tech­nol­ogy pro­gres­sively moves
into schools. Sim­i­larly, and more sig­nif­i­cantly, this envi­ron­ment requires
increas­ing empha­sis on devel­op­ing stu­dents’ metacog­ni­tive reg­u­la­tion, exec­u­tive
func­tion­ing, and emo­tional self-management.

How can we help stu­dents develop strate­gies for con­trol­ling their
atten­tion given the dig­i­tal dis­trac­tions to which stu­dents are every­where exposed?
What is your school doing? 

The School of One

As I was read­ing my Google Reader, I came across a post by Ta-Nehisi Coates who is a senior edi­tor for The Atlantic.  In the post he describes his expe­ri­ences at school, which were any­thing but per­fect.  He attended a typ­i­cal school, but was turned off by the “mass pro­duc­tion” model in his school.  Ta-Nehisi’s post com­pares his school expe­ri­ence to the School of One in the South Bronx.  The School of One oper­ates in the fol­low­ing way:

Together they cre­ated an algo­rithm capa­ble of weigh­ing a student’s
aca­d­e­mic needs, his or her learn­ing pref­er­ence, and the class­room
resources. Here’s how it works: first, the stu­dent and his par­ents and
teach­ers are sur­veyed about his class­room habits. Then the stu­dent takes
a diag­nos­tic test to see how well he under­stands basic math. Those data
are then sent to the New York Depart­ment of Education’s head­quar­ters in
Lower Man­hat­tan, where School of One’s algo­rithm pro­duces a ten­ta­tive
les­son plan. That les­son plan is then e-mailed to the student’s
teach­ers, who revise it as they see fit. At the end of every day, the
stu­dent takes another short diag­nos­tic, which is used to cre­ate another
ten­ta­tive les­son plan that appears in the teach­ers’ inboxes by eight
o’clock that evening.”

Even after read­ing about the school and watch­ing the video, I still can’t quite wrap my head around the con­cept (I’m still hop­ing to get out to New York to check it out!)  There is one huge piece about the pro­gram that is clear, and that is the fact that the pro­gram has an edu­ca­tional plan designed specif­i­cally for each stu­dent.  The tech­nol­ogy is used in a way that enables teach­ers to indi­vivid­u­al­ize instruc­tion for each stu­dent.  I’ll end this post with an excerpt from the Ta-Nehisi’s post and a video describ­ing the School of One.  It is inter­est­ing that even in the 80’s he noted how the tech­nol­ogy was used in the same ways as pen and paper.  This con­tin­ues to be a chal­lenge even for some edu­ca­tors who embrace tech­nol­ogy, but the School of One is cer­tainly a model of some­thing very unique.

As for the class­room of the past—of my past—I entered school just as
edu­ca­tors began grap­pling with the computer’s poten­tial to help teach­ers
and stu­dents. By the time I was in high school, we were using the
com­puter lab once a week for math. But we were using it the same way we
used pen and paper—a teacher at the front of the class and all of us
fol­low­ing along. The com­puter lab bored me as much as the chalk­board. By
then, I knew that I wasn’t tak­ing to education-as-mass-production. I
thought I was lazy (and maybe I was) and lack­ing the will to learn. But
as I watched the kids at I.S. 339 work­ing at their own pace and in their
own way, I won­dered if all I had ever really needed was the equiv­a­lent
of a warm hug from a cold algorithm.”

Pro­gram Overview from NYCDOE Teacher Devel­op­ment on Vimeo.

Nick Sauers

The iPad and education


Retrieved from Flickr

The excite­ment sur­round­ing the iPad prior to its release and
since that time has been astound­ing. 
Many edublog­gers have seen it as an amaz­ing tool to improve
schools.  Oth­ers have crit­i­cized it
for the things that it can­not do. 
Prior to receiv­ing my iPad, I was very skep­ti­cal about how it could
change schools.  It seemed like a
tool that would only allow stu­dents to remain as pas­sive con­sumers of
infor­ma­tion as opposed to cre­ators of infor­ma­tion.  My opin­ions have swayed some­what since get­ting my hands on
one, but some con­cerns still exist. 
Below I have listed things I see as major con­cerns and benefits.


  • Stu­dents can’t cre­ate on an iPad like they can
    on a laptop.
  • The iPad may pro­mote the tra­di­tional model of
    school as opposed to trans­form­ing schools.
  • Schools may need to pur­chase numer­ous
    appli­ca­tions to make the iPad more useful.


  • Stu­dents will have access to much more
  • Infor­ma­tion can be pre­sented in mul­ti­ple ways  (print, video, and audio) which may
    increase stu­dent engagement.
  •  Stu­dents may be more engaged because teach­ers
    can use infor­ma­tion in classes that is more rel­e­vant to students.

I believe the jury is still out on this debate.  Even if the iPad isn’t the tool that helps
move stu­dents to the top of Bloom’s Tax­on­omy, it may enhance edu­ca­tion.  It cer­tainly has the poten­tial to
increase stu­dent engage­ment, which has been found to also increase stu­dent

So how should schools proceed?

At work­shops I deliver with Scott McLeod or other CASTLE
mem­bers, we talk about how it is impor­tant to have “scouts” in edu­ca­tion.  Those scouts are teach­ers in the  dis­trict will­ing to exper­i­ment with new
tech­nol­ogy and report back their expe­ri­ences with it.  Did they work in their classes?  If the tool is no good…..ditch it.  If it looks, feels, and acts like it
could have a pos­i­tive impact on edu­ca­tion, latch onto it. 

It will be inter­est­ing to see and hear back from schools
that have already embraced the iPad. 
Those schools may serve as scouts for oth­ers who are a lit­tle more leery
about this new tech­nol­ogy.  It will
also be inter­est­ing to track the future gen­er­a­tions of the iPad.  As amaz­ing as the iPad is, it is only
gen­er­a­tion one!

Please weigh-in on this con­ver­sa­tion if you have feel­ings
about using the iPad in schools.

Nick Sauers

What message does your school website send?

 I recently par­tic­i­pated in a
facil­ity walk through of a school in an effort to eval­u­ate the facil­ity for
var­i­ous com­po­nents.  Safety and
sig­nage were two major pieces of the eval­u­a­tion check­list I was using.  I also tried to assess what type of
mes­sage the build­ing sent me as a new­comer to the school.  Because I was a total out­sider, I was
able to pro­vide the build­ing admin­is­tra­tor with some feed­back about things that
may be hard for some­one to see when they are involved in the day to day
oper­a­tions of a school.

This process made me think
that a sim­i­lar pro­ce­dure may be a help­ful way to eval­u­ate school web­sites.  I would argue that most school web­sites
are bad……real bad.  Some look nice,
but they aren’t very func­tional. 
Oth­ers are rarely updated, and most of the infor­ma­tion is very
out­dated.  Com­mu­nity mem­bers quit
going to the school web page because it is use­less or there is never new
infor­ma­tion on it.  Here are some
ques­tions to use when eval­u­at­ing your web­site:

What mes­sage does your web
page send?

Is ALL infor­ma­tion cur­rent?

Is it updated with cur­rent
events (grad­u­a­tion, plays, and other activities)?

Are stu­dent pic­tures

Is the site easy to
nav­i­gate?  Can forms be viewed and
assessed eas­ily?

Can staff emails be eas­ily

The 2010 Schoole Awards selected
the top web­sites of the year.  The
win­ners were selected by vote, so the order of the win­ners may be a bit of a
pop­u­lar­ity con­test, but final­ists were selected by an “expert” panel.  The Clear Creek Inde­pen­dent School
is the num­ber 2 vote get­ter. 
The site has cur­rent pic­tures of grad­u­a­tion, and it is very easy to
nav­i­gate.  Although the front page
con­tains lots of infor­ma­tion, it doesn’t appear to be too over­loaded like some
web pages.  These sites may serve
as mod­els for dis­tricts attempt­ing to update their own web pages.

Nick Sauers

order valium no prescription valium for sale order valium overnight buy soma buy soma without prescription buy soma without prescriptions cheap diazepam online diazepam online pharmacy buy diazepam rx order phentermine online phentermine online pharmacy cheap phentermine no prescription buy tramadol no rx buy tramadol no prescription purchase tramadol order xanax overnight buy xanax online without prescription order xanax online ativan no prescription buy ativan online without prescription ativan no rx buy klonopin overnight shipping klonopin online pharmacy cheap klonopin no prescription order provigil online overnight buy provigil no prescription buy provigil online mastercard overnight buy ambien online cheap buy ambien online without prescription ambien no prescription