Archive for February 2010

1 to 1 can transform education

As I write my posts, I often worry that I have become too neg­a­tive and cyn­i­cal.  I see, hear, and read about many of the flaws with our cur­rent sys­tem.  On my flight to Mum­bai, I began read­ing Caught in the Mid­dle, which is an extremely depress­ing read for some­one who grew up in the rural Mid­west.  There are times when I truly won­der if our cur­rent sys­tem even has the poten­tial to suc­ceed.  I won­der if schools will become as irrel­e­vant as land line tele­phones have become.

For­tu­nately, I fre­quently get the chance to visit class­rooms in one to one schools and talk with their edu­ca­tors.  Although just mov­ing to one to one will not trans­form a school, it does help open the door for change.  On Wednes­day I had the oppor­tu­nity to tour the Amer­i­can School of Bom­bay.  I left that tour with a great deal of excite­ment about the future of edu­ca­tion.  Three class­rooms in par­tic­u­lar stood out as amaz­ing exam­ples of how tech­nol­ogy can enhance learn­ing.  It is impor­tant to men­tion that these classes didn’t stand out sim­ply because of tech­nol­ogy, but because the tech­nol­ogy was enhanc­ing learn­ing in their  class­rooms.  Too often, edu­ca­tional lead­ers believe that by sim­ply pur­chas­ing tech­nol­ogy, edu­ca­tion will mag­i­cally change.  Obvi­ously, that is not reality.

Thoughts on three dif­fer­ent classrooms.….

One instructor’s class­room that I vis­ited had a very unique feel to it.  Stu­dents were very engaged and had real own­er­ship in the class­room.  At the begin­ning of the class the teacher made the com­ment that, “I even go to the board once in a while and teach”.  That state­ment may explain part of the rea­son stu­dents had such a high sense of own­er­ship in his class.  Dur­ing his class, stu­dents solved prob­lems on the board and explained their think­ing to the rest of the class.  I heard great con­ver­sa­tions take place among the stu­dents about the best way to solve the prob­lems. These con­ver­sa­tions were heav­ily stu­dent cen­tered.  Tech­nol­ogy was used as a tool to enhance col­lab­o­ra­tion between stu­dents.  Google Wave was a tool used by stu­dents to col­lab­o­rate as they worked through their assign­ments.  Stu­dents posted com­ments and feed­back to one another out­side of class, and even took pic­tures of for­mu­las on their cell phones to post to Google Wave.  That col­lab­o­ra­tion could not have hap­pened with­out ubiq­ui­tous com­puter access.

I also observed an ele­men­tary teacher who used a blog as a tool for stu­dents to col­lab­o­rate and pro­vide feed­back about a book they had read.  This allowed stu­dents to make com­ments and even receive feed­back out­side of the school day.  Learn­ing didn’t stop once stu­dents left the school build­ing!  One fourth grade stu­dent that I vis­ited with stated that tech­nol­ogy was used through­out the day.  It was very appar­ent that tech­nol­ogy was a reg­u­lar occur­rence, as opposed to a spe­cial event.

A third class­room that stuck out was a mid­dle school music les­son.  Stu­dents in the class were given the task of “invent­ing” their own musi­cal instru­ment.  When we walked in the room, many stu­dents were work­ing on their inven­tion while oth­ers were work­ing on their com­put­ers.  The stu­dents explained that they had used the com­put­ers to com­pose their own music and to record them­selves play­ing an instru­ment.  Stu­dents were able to cre­ate in a way that may have been very dif­fi­cult with­out technology.

These class­rooms are all exam­ples of how instruc­tors used tech­nol­ogy to enhance learn­ing in their school.  None of their lessons were about tech­nol­ogy, but they all used tech­nol­ogy.  Stu­dents in the school were def­i­nitely doing work at the upper end of Bloom’s Tax­on­omy.  This tour of the school ener­gized me, and gave me opti­mism about the future of schools!

100_0037

Mumbai TEDASB

100_0041

Last night I attended a TED X ASB event in Mum­bai.  The speak­ers included Scott McLeod, Doug John­son, Scott Klososky, Hellen Bieret, Bruce Dixon, and a video from Pranav Mistery’s TED pre­sen­ta­tion.  I have included notes and var­i­ous links from the pre­sen­ta­tions.  Hope­fully, the pre­sen­ta­tions will be posted on the TED site very soon.  The speak­ers were excellent!

Nick Sauers

Mumbai Preconference

After nearly 20 hours in the air and stops at four air­ports, I’ve made it to Mum­bai, India with col­leagues Scott McLeod and Jamie Fath for ASB Unplugged.  Today (Wednes­day) was the pre­con­fer­ence ses­sion with speaker Bruce Dixon from Any­where Any­time Learn­ing Foun­da­tion (AALF).

One of the great parts of the day was lis­ten­ing to and par­tic­i­pat­ing in con­ver­sa­tions with edu­ca­tors from around the world.  I was for­tu­nate to sit next to Dr. Bruce Kelsh who is a prin­ci­pal at an inter­na­tional school in Hong Kong that is mak­ing the move to one to one next year.  At lunch I also had a con­ver­sa­tion with Shabbi Luthra who is the direc­tor of tech­nol­ogy at ASB. Many of the chal­lenges of these edu­ca­tors are sim­i­lar to those things fac­ing edu­ca­tors in the United States.  Those chal­lenges include pro­vid­ing teacher sup­port and get­ting every­one on board with one to one.  With years of expe­ri­ence in a one to one school, Shabbi had some very inter­est­ing per­spec­tives on both issues.  Hope­fully after vis­it­ing ASB tomor­row, I will be able to get some addi­tional insight into these issues from an expe­ri­enced one to one school.

The pre­sen­ta­tion itself cov­ered lots of mate­ri­als.  Bruce warned us that he had enough mate­ri­als for four days, and he did have lots of infor­ma­tion.  Take a look at my notes from the day, but please note that I have a cou­ple of disclaimers.…

  1. I don’t claim that my notes are com­plete.  Feel free to con­tact me if you were at the con­fer­ence and you would like to add to the notes or share your notes also! (njsauers@iastate.edu)
  2. Many things I have writ­ten down are sim­ply ques­tions or con­ver­sa­tion starters.

You may also want to take a look at Wes Fryer’s notes  or a Pow­er­Point from one of Bruce’s pre­vi­ous pre­sen­ta­tions.  The con­ver­sa­tion from ASB Unplugged can also be fol­lowed on Twit­ter with the hash-tag ASBUP2010.

Nick Sauers

Mumbai here we come!

I’m cur­rently sit­ting in the Des Moines air­port wait­ing to begin my long trek to Mum­bai, India for the Amer­i­can School of Bom­bay (ASB) Unplugged One-to-One Learn­ing Con­fer­ence.  The descrip­tion for the con­fer­ence, which is listed below, really gets me excited for the conference!

ASB Un-Plugged 2010 is for those who wish
to under­stand how stu­dents and edu­ca­tors have embraced inno­va­tion,
change, and lead­er­ship in edu­ca­tion for the 21st cen­tury. Hear
edu­ca­tors and stu­dents shar­ing their best prac­tices, strate­gies and
tech­niques, ideas and appli­ca­tions that have proven to be suc­cess­ful in
a one-to-one envi­ron­ment. Learn about the admin­is­tra­tion of the
program—launching a lap­top pro­gram, pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment, class­room
man­age­ment, respon­si­ble use poli­cies, com­mu­nity sup­port, resources, and
sup­port structures.”

Although my days will be packed full of great expe­ri­ences, I hope to be able to blog while I am away.  I look for­ward to learn­ing from lots of expert edu­ca­tors from around the world! 

Barriers to learning with technology

As schools attempt to enhance learn­ing through tech­nol­ogy use, there are some bar­ri­ers that quickly get in the way.  I wit­nessed two of those bar­ri­ers yes­ter­day while at a work­shop with other edu­ca­tors.  The first bar­rier was the lack of a strong infra­struc­ture to sup­port the tech­nol­ogy needs of our group.  The sec­ond was the lack of inter­net access because of blocks setup on computers.

When schools move to one to one, these two con­cerns must be addressed!  I have wit­nessed the frus­tra­tions that devel­oped when this hasn’t hap­pened.  Unfor­tu­nately, these bar­ri­ers become rea­sons for some indi­vid­u­als to not change their prac­tices.  As edu­ca­tional lead­ers, you must destroy these barriers!

Although the issues with infra­struc­ture may not be your exper­tise, you are respon­si­ble for ensur­ing that your sys­tem works.  If it doesn’t, every­thing else becomes trivial. 

The sec­ond bar­rier that I encoun­tered yes­ter­day was the block­ing of sites.  This is a mas­sive issue with many schools.  I rou­tinely talk to admin­is­tra­tors and other edu­ca­tors who are extremely frus­trated by the blocks that their schools have in place.  My chal­lenge to them and to you is to con­front this issue.  If you can’t get these blocks removed, then who can? 

These two bar­ri­ers may seem evi­dent to many of you, but they may be the largest ini­tial road­blocks schools face.  Mak­ing the move to one to one and truly trans­form­ing edu­ca­tion is a huge and com­plex chal­lenge.   These bar­ri­ers may be some of the eas­i­est things to remove, but if they aren’t removed it will be extremely dif­fi­cult to move one to one for­ward.  One to one needs to be about enhanc­ing learn­ing through the use of tech­nol­ogy.  Unfor­tu­nately, too often tech­nol­ogy is not used to its fullest poten­tial because of some of these con­cerns that can occur.

Nick Sauers

Broadband, Bandwidth, Boondoggle?

If you’ve got 1-to-1, you’ve got wire­less.  You want your stu­dents to have flex­i­bil­ity so they can bring their dig­i­tal assis­tants around the school to dif­fer­ent class­rooms, to their homes, to libraries, on field trips, to grandma’s, to their away sports games — every­where.  Because once learn­ing is no longer rooted to a spe­cific place, and once learn­ers are no longer teth­ered to a net­work drop, and once learn­ers own fully the dig­i­tal device for their own learn­ing, the pos­si­bil­i­ties for learn­ing expand expo­nen­tially.  Stu­dents with their own dig­i­tal devices for use at home and school become more orga­nized and engaged in their own indi­vid­u­al­ized learn­ing, and are empow­ered to write, research, revise, cre­ate, present, draw, pub­lish, ana­lyze, syn­the­size and think deeply.  

Addi­tion­ally, many homes have broad­band access to the Inter­net so that when stu­dents go home, they have access to on demand stream­ing video and full Web 2.0 tools. The same is true at many libraries and Inter­net cafes.  Teach­ers often have sim­i­lar access.

How­ever, in many schools, this is not the case.  There is a cost involved for Inter­net access, with a T-1 giv­ing about 1.5 Mb of access to the Inter­net. Even with 2 T-1’s there’s only 3 Mb. Con­sider mul­ti­ple class­rooms access­ing the Inter­net and view­ing stream­ing video (which offers many cur­ric­u­lar pos­si­bil­i­ties, for instance the offer­ings on National Geo­graphic) and it will be obvi­ous access will slow down.  

Addi­tion­ally, each dig­i­tal assis­tant needs to con­nect to an Access Point which is then con­nected (via a wire) to the school’s net­work.  With too few access points, or access points that are not con­fig­ured so that lap­tops don’t just hold on to one access point but move with the stu­dents, or are not bal­anced accord­ing to the num­ber of com­put­ers per access point (usu­ally 15 lap­tops each) — slow­downs will occur as well.

There are pos­si­bil­i­ties on the hori­zon includ­ing WiMAX, and even Google says they are enter­ing the mar­ket although ini­tially for home use.  

How­ever, expec­ta­tions are high so if you are explor­ing 1-to-1, it’s best to have some­one take a seri­ous look at your exist­ing net­work and con­nec­tion to the Inter­net, and con­sider hav­ing a wire­less audit done of your spaces.  This audit involves a wire­less expert ask­ing ques­tions about how many class­rooms will need access and where and then walk­ing around the cam­pus, per­haps using elec­tronic tools, and help­ing you decide how many access points you need and where.  Then once your access points are in place, they need to be con­fig­ured so that not too many lap­tops go to each, and so that mov­ing around  your spaces while main­tain­ing net­work access is pos­si­ble.  Lastly, see how much Inter­net access you can afford —  eRate can help with fund­ing your access.

Pamela Liv­ingston
Author of “1-to-1 Learn­ing: Lap­top Pro­grams That Work” (2nd ed., 2009)

Two more PD events!

Feb­ru­ary and March are hotbeds of activ­ity for state and national edu­ca­tion and tech­nol­ogy con­fer­ences. Next week I’ll be at both ends of the U.S. at two con­fer­ences of inter­est to 1:1 schools.

NAIS is the National Asso­ci­a­tion of Inde­pen­dent Schools annual con­fer­ence. Pri­vate schools have been on the fore­front of the lap­top move­ment both in the US and around the world. The 2010 con­fer­ence is in San Fran­cisco Feb 24–26,  and I’ll be there with the Con­struc­tivist Con­sor­tium. This is a group of small com­pa­nies who pro­mote con­struc­tivist use of soft­ware in schools for cre­ativ­ity and student-centered learn­ing. We’ll be at booth 239 — come by and say hello!

PETE&C is the Penn­syl­va­nia state tech­nol­ogy con­fer­ence held annu­ally in Her­shey, PA. Yes, that Her­shey, and yes, it does smell like choco­late! Run­ning Feb 24–27, this con­fer­ence has many ses­sions devoted to lap­tops and 1:1 schools. Pennsylvania’s edu­ca­tion reform pro­gram, Class­rooms for the Future (CFF) has cre­ated a strong net­work of educator-coaches who sup­port inno­v­a­tive pro­grams statewide. Build­ing inter­nal lead­er­ship like this is a ter­rific idea, and Penn­syl­va­nia is cer­tainly reap­ing the ben­e­fits of invest­ing in their own people.

At PETE&C, I’ll be doing a ses­sion on Feb 23 on stu­dent lead­er­ship and dig­i­tal cit­i­zen­ship — if you are going to PETE&C I hope you’ll stop by.

Stu­dent lead­er­ship is some­thing that 1:1 schools can greatly ben­e­fit from. The guid­ing prin­ci­ple of putting power into stu­dent hands can be both con­crete (actu­ally hand­ing them equip­ment) and abstract (giv­ing them respon­si­bil­ity and agency over their learn­ing). Both sup­port each other, and schools that give stu­dents respon­si­bil­ity and guide them as they learn to use it gain so much. Stu­dents who believe that they have a stake in their own edu­ca­tion will con­tribute to the effort to make edu­ca­tion bet­ter for all. Schools can take this 1:1 empow­er­ment to heart and help cre­ate the cit­i­zens, learn­ers, and lead­ers we need in the world.

So I hope I meet some of you “1:1 Schools Blog” read­ers in Her­shey or San Fran­cisco — Scott tells us there are actu­ally read­ers out there and I believe him!

Sylvia Mar­tinez
Gen­er­a­tion YES

Two Upcoming Free Professional Development Opportunities — HURRY AND SIGN UP!

Hey, maybe we all can’t go to ASBs Unplugged Con­fer­ence in Mum­bai at the end of this month, but there are other options on the hori­zon. Want to learn and grow pro­fes­sion­ally with­out hav­ing to worry about dip­ping into the pock­et­book? Check out these two upcom­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties that are geared toward edu­ca­tors in 1:1 pro­grams. They look very interesting.

The Cap­i­tal Region Soci­ety for Tech­nol­ogy in Edu­ca­tion (CRSTE) Cyber Con­fer­ence runs from Feb­ru­ary 21 — March 5. Speak­ers include: Ian Jukes, Doug John­son, Sylvia Mar­tinez and many oth­ers. You can get credit for your par­tic­i­pa­tion on work­shops. Hurry because ses­sions are lim­ited to 200 participants.

Edu­ca­tion Week is host­ing a Webi­nar titled, The 1-to-1 Com­put­ing Chal­lenge: Over­com­ing Bar­ri­ers on March 4th from 2:00 — 3:00 pm (ET).
Pre­sen­ters: 
Matt Federoff, chief infor­ma­tion offi­cer, Vail School Dis­trict, Vail, Ariz., 
Steve Gar­ton, coor­di­na­tor of edu­ca­tional tech­nol­ogy, Maine Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion 
Brion Deitsch, super­in­ten­dent, Fairview Park City Schools, Fairview Park, Ohio 

Hope to see you there!

We need your help!

If you’re the prin­ci­pal of a technology-rich school (i.e., all you 1:1 prin­ci­pals out there), Project RED is ask­ing you to help them with its nation­wide sur­vey.
Project RED may be doing the best research in the coun­try right now on
1:1 schools. The results will be used for pol­icy advo­cacy. Hope you can
help out with Project RED. After you com­plete the sur­vey, check out the other resources that are avail­able to you!

A description of digital natives

In Wednesday’s post I high­lighted some find­ings from the Kaiser Fam­ily Foun­da­tion about todays stu­dents and their use of media.  Infor­ma­tion from that report are included in Dig­i­tal Nation’s web­site and TV series.  Their web­site takes a look at the effects of tech­nol­ogy on our dig­i­tal natives.  This site is extremely user friendly and you can point on a par­tic­u­lar body part to view impacts tech­nol­ogy has had on each part.  Here are some of the inter­est­ing pieces of infor­ma­tion from the site.

  • Search­ing online acti­vates more brain regions than read­ing printed words
  • Video gam­ing in mod­er­a­tion can help develop improved pat­tern recog­ni­tion, more sys­tem­atic think­ing and bet­ter exec­u­tive skills
  • Dig­i­tal Natives aged 13 to 17 aver­age 1,742 text mes­sages a month
  • The more abbre­vi­a­tions pre-teens use in their text mes­sages, the higher they score on tests of vocab­u­lary and reading
  • Play­ing action video games one hour a day for just 10 days improves and widens visual attention
  • 19 per­cent of Dig­i­tal Natives 13 to 19 say they’ve sent nude or
    semi-nude pho­tos of them­selves via text or e-mail — this is called
    “sexting”

More infor­ma­tion about dig­i­tal nation.….

“Dig­i­tal Nation is a new, open source PBS project that explores what it
means to be human in an entirely new world — a dig­i­tal world.”  It
con­sists of this site as well as a major FRONTLINE doc­u­men­tary which aired on Feb. 2, 2010.

You’ll want to take 10–15 min­utes to visit their site and view their series from PBS.  This is a great way to start a con­ver­sa­tion about what todays learn­ers look like. 

Take a look at the short trailer from the video.