Archive for November 2009

The Future for Librarians

Back in Sep­tem­ber I wrote about the future of libraries.  I didn’t have all of the answers then, and I surely don’t today.  Since that post­ing, I have done some addi­tional read­ing and had con­ver­sa­tions with oth­ers about not only the future of libraries, but also the future of librar­i­ans.  I recently heard Dr. Michael Eisen­berg, a Pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­sity of Wash­ing­ton and for­mer librar­ian, present on infor­ma­tion lit­er­acy.   Dr. Eisen­berg spoke about librar­i­ans recre­at­ing their jobs and becom­ing Chief Infor­ma­tion Offi­cers for schools (CIOs). 

Dr. Scott McLeod recently spoke at the Iowa Library Asso­ci­a­tion Con­fer­ence.  Dur­ing his pre­sen­ta­tion, he pre­sented ten ques­tions.  By the looks of the feed­back that I read, his ques­tions were received with mixed reviews.  Some seemed to totally dis­agree with his pre­sen­ta­tion while oth­ers seemed moti­vated to look at their own practices.

As a for­mer teacher and prin­ci­pal I have worked with numer­ous librar­i­ans, and each of those librar­i­ans assumed some­what dif­fer­ent roles. 

So what is the future for librarians?  

First of all admin­is­tra­tors and librar­i­ans should be ask­ing and dis­cussing this ques­tion.  My belief is that librar­i­ans who truly become CIOs for schools will become one of the most impor­tant play­ers as schools con­tinue to increase their tech­nol­ogy use.  This may mean that librar­i­ans take a true lead­er­ship posi­tion in schools. 

Although ask­ing these ques­tions may seem threat­en­ing to some librar­i­ans, I believe the dis­cus­sion it stim­u­lates may increase the effec­tive­ness of librar­i­ans.  Some may also feel that they have already assumed the role of CIO in their dis­trict.  My obser­va­tions of schools is that this isn’t the case for most dis­tricts.  I must admit that as an admin­is­tra­tor I was guilty of not hav­ing these con­ver­sa­tions with librar­i­ans.  That may have been in part because I was a lit­tle unclear about all of the job respon­si­bil­i­ties of a librar­ian.  For­tu­nately, I was lucky and the last librar­ian who I worked with did assume the role of a tech­nol­ogy leader. 

As admin­is­tra­tors we need to effec­tively use the exper­tise of our
librar­i­ans.  We can do this by help­ing them rede­fine their roles, and
 pro­vid­ing addi­tional train­ing if nec­es­sary.  We can’t just hope to get lucky as I did at the end of my principalship.

Laptops – Not for Listening

When lap­tops are used well,
they become dig­i­tal assis­tants for stu­dents, pro­vid­ing dis­trib­uted resources
for research, writ­ing, edit­ing, ana­lyz­ing, pre­sent­ing, syn­the­siz­ing,
pub­lish­ing, and cre­at­ing - 
empow­er­ing stu­dents with nearly every­thing needed for learn­ing. 

While there are times
teach­ers will need to say “lids down” (for lap­tops) or “pens down” (for
tablets) so the whole class can hear infor­ma­tion – most of the time the teacher
in a class­room equipped with lap­tops will be cir­cu­lat­ing around the room,
men­tor­ing and sup­port­ing stu­dents. 

But some­times schools want
to retro­fit an exist­ing “teacher cen­tric” class­room with lap­tops — the type of
class­room where good lis­ten­ers with ade­quate work­ing mem­ory can regur­gi­tate what
they heard and repeat it back via a test, work­sheet, or even in a research paper.  The prob­lem is, lap­tops are not good
for lis­ten­ing.  They’re good for
research­ing, for writ­ing, for think­ing, for col­lab­o­rat­ing, for cre­at­ing and for doing, and
they’re not good for lis­ten­ing.  They’re good for a student-centered model, not a teacher-centered one.

One edu­ca­tor describes his
expe­ri­ence mov­ing toward a student-centered model and attempt­ing to find
fur­ni­ture that would work in that envi­ron­ment.  He had an array of fur­ni­ture deal­ers pre­sent­ing their wares
and finally tells this story:

“We
had a great deal of dif­fi­culty in find­ing what we needed, and finally one
dealer … made this remark, “I am afraid we [do not have] what you want.  You want some­thing at which the
chil­dren may work; these are all for listening.” 

Dewey, J. (1902). The School and Soci­ety and the
Child and the Cur­ricu­lum.  Chicago
and Lon­don: Uni­ver­sity of Chicago Press

Yes, the cita­tion is accu­rate — the edu­ca­tor was John
Dewey and the year was 1902.  
While this was not about lap­tops, it was about cre­at­ing class­rooms that
are not for lis­ten­ing.  Class­rooms
equipped with lap­tops or tablets are not about lis­ten­ing, either, and if they
are, will not real­ize the poten­tial that 1 to 1 can provide.

Free Online Conference

K12 Online has offered a free on-line con­fer­ence since 2006.  I dis­cov­ered this con­fer­ence through Wes­ley Fryer while attend­ing his pre­sen­ta­tion at the Great Lakes Com­put­ing Con­fer­ence.  The great thing about this con­fer­ence is that it is FREE, and you can attend from any­where.  The pre-conference keynote will be posted next Mon­day, and it will be fol­lowed by a live chat on Decem­ber 4.  The pre­sen­ter is Kim Cofino, and the ses­sion is enti­tled Going Global:  Cul­ture Shock, Con­ver­gence, and the Future of Educ­tion.

I think it will be worth your time to take a look at the sched­ule for 2009.  There are var­i­ous top­ics that could be very help­ful for admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers who are con­tin­u­ously try­ing to grow pro­fes­sion­ally in this area.

Periodic Dipsticking: Find out how your laptop initiative is progressing

DipsticksDipsticks
Oil Dip­stick Bou­quet by RIP­izzo

I love the sim­ple sur­vey that Pamela Liv­ingston shows in her lat­est post and would encour­age all schools that are plan­ning or imple­ment­ing a 1-to-1 Lap­top pro­gram to design their own to use peri­od­i­cally. The results will pro­vide you with valu­able infor­ma­tion on how the pro­gram is going. Use them with teach­ers, stu­dents and parents. 

Keep it sim­ple and make it easy to com­pile the results. Even if the results ver­ify what you know, it will be worth your time. While the data below did not come from a for­mal sur­vey, just think about what your lead­er­ship team could do with this type of infor­ma­tion from stu­dents. The fol­low­ing quotes from stu­dents were posted in a school’s stu­dent news­pa­per while the school was in the first semes­ter of imple­ment­ing their lap­top program.

“Have Lap­tops Ben­e­fited [School’s Name]?”

“No, because we don’t use them, but we still have to carry them to every class along with our fold­ers, which we were told we wouldn’t need anymore.”
- Anony­mous Student

“Yeah, it’s a faster way to look up infor­ma­tion, even though I only use mine for Skype and Facebook.”
- Another Anony­mous Student

Vote for ISTE Conference Keynote!

The ISTE Con­fer­ence, which will be held in Den­ver, Col­orado from June 17–20, is now in the sec­ond phase of on-line vot­ing for the conference’s keynote speaker.  The first vote was for the topic, and phase two is for the actual pre­sen­ters.  The top 5 top­ics were as fol­lows (in order):

  1. Effec­tive school lead­er­ship for the dig­i­tal, global era
  2. Trends, tools, and tac­tics for 21st cen­tury learn­ing
  3. Per­sonal learn­ing with 21st cen­tury tools
  4. Uni­ver­sal design for learn­ing
  5. Why has tech­nol­ogy affected so lit­tle change on teach­ing and learn­ing?

Please take a minute to go to the site and vote for a presenter!

Pay Attention!

This video from Teacher­Tube is worth shar­ing with indi­vid­u­als who are a lit­tle leary about the changes involved with the one to one ini­tia­tive.  It includes some inter­est­ing sta­tis­tics from the National Cen­ter for Edu­ca­tion Statistics.

  • Only 28 per­cent of 12th graders believe their work is meaningful.
  • 21 per­cent believe their courses are interesting.
  • Only 39 per­cent believe school work will have any bear­ing on their suc­cess in later life.

.…..and those are the opin­ions of those stu­dents who grad­u­ated!  Those num­bers alone should be a call for schools to do some­thing different. 

Many pol­icy mak­ers have been hes­i­tant to move to one to one because they haven’t seen any con­crete data about how tech­nol­ogy improves stu­dent achieve­ment.  Unfor­tu­nately, that data isn’t yet avail­able on a large scale because so few schools have imple­mented one to one at this time. 

I’m going to go out on a limb and say there are more impor­tant things than stu­dent achieve­ment as mea­sured by stan­dard­ized tests.  Yes, it would be great if the data once com­piled revealed that stu­dents had made big gains with stu­dent achieve­ment.  But if the data doesn’t reveal those gains, should we assume that ubiq­ui­tous tech­nol­ogy has no place in education.  

Tech­nol­ogy is a tool that allows stu­dents to cre­ate, col­lab­o­rate, prob­lem solve, and think crit­i­cally in ways that are extremely dif­fi­cult with­out tech­nol­ogy. Those are the skills our employ­ers are look­ing for, although those aren’t the skills that are tested on our stan­dard­ized tests. 

Student Survey of 700+ Students – Part 2 of 2

This is Part 2 of the post about a sur­vey of over 700 stu­dents from the U.S., Switzer­land, Aus­tralia, Israel that responded to a vol­un­tary sur­vey posted using Google forms.  To find par­tic­i­pants, I sent out requests to teach­ers and school lead­ers via Twit­ter, list­servs such as Ed-Tech and plain vanilla email to peo­ple I knew at 1-to-1 schools.  The sur­vey was to be anony­mous with only ini­tials of par­tic­i­pants — and teach­ers were to give their stu­dents access how­ever they chose – as a link on a Web page, through email, or in class.  Teach­ers explained their own abil­ity to see the results so stu­dents under­stood this.  I gave rights to all the teach­ers who involved their stu­dents to the under­ly­ing Google spread­sheet and graphs. 

The sur­vey was short with a few mul­ti­ple choice and optional open-ended ques­tions.  It inten­tion­ally involved this type of choice along with the forum for stu­dents to express their opin­ions. Many edu­ca­tors know the value of allow­ing stu­dents this oppor­tu­nity to express their ideas not just in choos­ing one project or another – but in describ­ing what works for their own learn­ing and why. 

How Might Lap­tops Ben­e­fit Schools?
The ques­tion posed about how lap­tops might ben­e­fit schools resulted in some thought­ful responses.  This is also where the stu­dents who did not sup­port using lap­tops had an oppor­tu­nity to describe their views.  The answers for the stu­dents (approx­i­mately 7%) who did not feel lap­tops were ben­e­fi­cial were around the dis­tractibil­ity fac­tor, and that the cost of the hard­ware was too high.  Here’s a sam­ple response from a stu­dent at an inde­pen­dent school cri­tiquing laptops:

“I am not a fan of the lap­tops. I think that they make me less focused. It’s hard to do home­work when you have email, Inter­net, and fun games there.”

While sev­eral oth­ers agreed, more responses were pos­i­tive, cit­ing ben­e­fits such as:

“…To have all … mate­ri­als in one device. Lap­tops are almost the only tool we need as stu­dents to have in class.”

Another stu­dent explained:

“Lap­tops cre­ate a more tech­ni­cal and com­mu­ni­ca­tion source for the stu­dents and teach­ers. It allows orga­ni­za­tion and inter­ac­tion between stu­dents and teachers.”

One school had sev­eral weather clos­ings but hav­ing a lap­top at home meant lit­tle inter­rup­tion to learn­ing accord­ing this student:

“…when we finally were back in class, it felt like we hadn’t missed a beat.  My Eng­lish and Span­ish teach­ers emailed us all of our home­work so we were not behind at all.”

Advice for Stu­dents New to Lap­tops
The ques­tion about advice for stu­dents new to lap­tops fell into sev­eral cat­e­gories includ­ing the “take care of it” camp; the “don’t go places you shouldn’t”  reminders, and rec­om­men­da­tions to take time to get to know and under­stand the com­puter.  Here are some sam­ple responses:

“Treat it very care­fully don’t pick it up by the screen; run virus scans, and back up your files.”

Use it wisely– its not just a tool for instant mes­sag­ing and for play­ing music– really take advan­tage of the amaz­ing opportunity.”

The advice I would give to a stu­dent using a lap­top is sim­ply, explore! Take advan­tage of the unique oppor­tu­nity you have been given and soak up every­thing you can.”

Orga­nize your com­puter to a way that will make it eas­ier for you to get what you need, and remem­ber where things are. Also, if you have trou­ble with your com­puter, never be afraid to ask some­one in charge (teacher, tech offi­cial, etc) for help.”

If you were to sur­vey stu­dents …
If you decide to poll your stu­dents, you may want to con­sider the type of ques­tions you cre­ate based on your over­all goals.  Open-ended optional ques­tions which begin with reflec­tive lan­guage such as “Think about…” along with a promise of anonymity will bring out sug­ges­tions, ideas, and crit­i­cisms from your largest stake­hold­ers which may pro­vide the key to improv­ing your one-to-one pro­gram.  Or if you haven’t yet gone one-to-one, find­ing out under­ly­ing beliefs and assump­tions from your stu­dent pop­u­la­tion will help you plan.

As to con­tent of your sur­vey you may want to hone in on cur­ric­u­lar areas; the types of projects or lessons that stu­dents see 1-to-1 fur­thers; issues stu­dents have had to over­come with lap­tops and how they did so; or their sug­ges­tions in gen­eral for the program.  

Con­tent for those still explor­ing one-to-one might tar­get how stu­dents would envi­sion them­selves as learn­ing if lap­tops were part of the envi­ron­ment; how cur­rent projects or lessons could be dif­fer­ent if they had their own dig­i­tal learn­ing device; how they would expect to han­dle, care for, and orga­nize a com­puter that moved from home to school.

Get­ting stake­holder thoughts and buyin helps you under­stand assump­tions and expec­ta­tions.  A sur­vey done well and thought­fully can be an impor­tant tool.

I Am What I Learn

Since Sep­tem­ber, stu­dents have cre­ated videos explain­ing why edu­ca­tion is impor­tant to their futures for a Fed­eral Edu­ca­tion Depart­ment con­test.  Ten of those videos have now been selected as final­ists, and the pub­lic is being encour­aged to help select the top three videos. 

You may be ask­ing your­self how this stu­dent video com­pe­ti­tion relates to one to one schools.  I prob­a­bly can’t effec­tively answer that ques­tion until you watch the videos.  The tech­nol­ogy stu­dents used in their videos allowed them to cre­ate in a way that would be extremely dif­fi­cult with­out tech­nol­ogy.  Stu­dents used music, var­i­ous media, act­ing, ani­ma­tion, and col­lab­o­ra­tion in their videos. 

The revised Bloom’s Tax­on­omy was pub­lished in 2001 and one of the biggest changes was the addi­tion of cre­at­ing as the high­est level of cog­ni­tive com­plex­ity.  The ten short videos these stu­dents pub­lished are excel­lent exam­ples of stu­dents cre­at­ing with tech­nol­ogy as a tool.  It is also inter­est­ing to note how dif­fer­ent each one of the videos were.  I won­der what the qual­ity of work for the stu­dents would have been if they were asked to make a poster or write a 1000 word essay.

The videos are only about two min­utes each, and I think you would find it worth your time to take a look.  Here is one of the videos.

The Future of Schools

I recently read an arti­cle enti­tled, “Tech­nol­ogy for the Infor­ma­tion Age:  Mov­ing Out of the Com­pla­cency Paral­y­sis” by War­ren W. Williams and Jo Ann Smith.  There are a cou­ple of quotes that jumped out when I read the article.

  • Those tech­no­log­i­cal advances that some­how seem to alien­ate pupils from the edu­ca­tional envi­ron­ment must also be used in that envi­ron­ment to cre­ate dynamic link­ages between the school and the world, the past and the present, and the teacher and the student.
  • The world is a giant net­work that ends at the front door of most Amer­i­can high schools.
  • The most per­sis­tent obsta­cle is that teach­ers are still most com­fort­able with what they do best, edu­cat­ing stu­dents in whole-group fash­ion within the con­fines of the self-contained classroom
  • Smoke­stack edu­ca­tion, where adults dis­pense insight but stu­dents are rarely engaged in mak­ing their own mean­ing or cre­at­ing their own insights, leaves Amer­ica ill equipped to com­pete in the information-based, global economy.

Do these descrip­tions sound famil­iar to you?  I’m guess­ing that the major­ity of U.S. stu­dents would agree these are pretty accu­rate descrip­tions of their school.  Inter­est­ingly, this arti­cle was pub­lished in March of 1994.  Most edu­ca­tors that I talk to agree there are some changes that need to take place in edu­ca­tion.  I just ques­tion how and when these changes will take place.  We’re nearly a decade into the 21st Cen­tury and yet peo­ple are con­tin­u­ally talk­ing about how to pre­pare stu­dents for the 21st Century. 

Whether we like it or not, the 21st Cen­tury is here!  Schools that have embraced one to one tech­nol­ogy seem to be mak­ing the change that so many other schools are resist­ing.  In Dis­rupt­ing Class:  How Dis­rup­tive Inno­va­tion Will Change the Way the World Learns, Clay­ton Chris­tensen trys to explain why schools haven’t changed and what the future is for our schools.  Accord­ing to his research, by 2014 25% of all high school courses will be taught on-line, and that num­ber will be 50% by 2019.  His research is also backed by recent research con­ducted by Ambi­ent Insight.

These are some pretty star­tling num­bers!  I’m not sure about all of you, but I know that I won’t be retired by 2014 or 2019. As edu­ca­tors there are var­i­ous approaches we can take.  We can bury our heads in the sand and deny that change is hap­pen­ing.  We can do every­thing pos­si­ble to resists change, or we can embrace the change and work to rede­fine what edu­ca­tion looks like in the future.

If the busi­ness world is any indi­ca­tion for us, we know what has hap­pened to those indus­tries that have ignored change.  On the other hand, we have also seen the dras­tic booms of indus­tries that have embraced tech­nol­ogy and used it to their advan­tage and the advan­tage of the customer.

I chal­lenge each of you to be part of the change that enables us to pro­vide a bet­ter edu­ca­tion for each of our stu­dents IN THE 21st CENTURY!

 

Williams, W. W. and J. A. Smith (1984). “Tech­nol­ogy for the Infor­ma­tion Age:  Mov­ing Out of the Com­pla­cency Paral­y­sis.” The Amer­i­can High School and Change:  Plan­ning, Man­ag­ing the Process…  A Look at Some Mod­els 78(560): 121.

Lausanne Laptop Institute

The Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute will be held July 18–20 in Mem­phis, Ten­nessee.  It is described as a inter­na­tional think tank for schools using or con­sid­er­ing lap­tops or tablets as tools for learn­ing.  I recently spoke with pre­vi­ous atten­dees of the con­fer­ence.  The feed­back they gave me was that the Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute was an amaz­ing pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment oppor­tu­nity.  I would strongly rec­om­mend that one to one schools con­sider send­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tives to the con­fer­ence.  The mis­sion state­ment and back­ground from the insti­tute are listed. 

Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute Mission

To facil­i­tate the growth of lap­top tech­nolo­gies in edu­ca­tion by
cre­at­ing a com­mu­nity of learn­ers among admin­is­tra­tors, tech­nol­ogy
per­son­nel, and teach­ers in schools that cur­rently use or are
con­sid­er­ing use of lap­tops in the classroom.

Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute Background

The Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute was cre­ated by and is hosted by
Lau­sanne Col­le­giate School in Mem­phis, Ten­nessee. When first devel­op­ing
our pro­gram ten years ago, we rec­og­nized the need for lap­top school
col­lab­o­ra­tion. The Lau­sanne Lap­top Insti­tute was cre­ated in this spirit
in order to facil­i­tate more con­ver­sa­tions and con­nec­tions between
lap­top schools.